• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Matt Ferchen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "China and the Developing World",
    "China’s Foreign Relations"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie China

Will China Transfer More Technology to Latin America?

China’s economic slowdown has prompted Latin American and Chinese officials to seek new areas of cooperation, notably in agricultural technology and infrastructure.

Link Copied
By Matt Ferchen
Published on Nov 11, 2015

Source: Latin America Advisor

Inter-American Dialogue: China’s experience in developing technology could make the country an important partner in helping Latin American countries diversify their economies, according to an October 20 report by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). How willing is China to share its expertise? Which countries in Latin America would benefit the most? To which sectors of Latin America’s economies should China provide targeted assistance? What economic lessons—and warnings—should Latin American countries learn from China?

Matt Ferchen: First, it’s important to note that ECLAC’s new report is about the region’s trade crisis. This crisis is directly linked to China’s own economic slowdown and changing growth model, both of which have affected the volume and price of some key Latin American commodity exports to China. This is in stark contrast to earlier ECLAC reports that emphasized the positive role that Chinese demand played in minimizing the impact of the global financial crisis on the region. The commodity boom, and what I’ve been calling the "easy phase" of China-Latin America relations (although they were clearly never that easy), is now obviously over and Latin America is dealing with the hangover. The end of the commodity boom provides the background and an explanation for why Latin American and Chinese officials and businesspeople are now more actively discussing ways to cooperate on new forms of trade and investment, including infrastructure and more high-tech trade. However, the likelihood that China will transfer any of its key manufacturing technologies to Latin America is very limited since this would undercut China’s own competitiveness. That said, technological upgrading in agricultural and food-based export industries is one area where cooperation is possible since Chinese demand for imports in this sector will likely remain strong. The ECLAC report argues that Latin America can learn from Chinese "long-term visions" and state support for technological upgrading, yet Chinese concerns about insufficient "innovation" and inefficient state-owned enterprises should lead to more careful evaluations of the real sources of China’s economic dynamism past and present.

This piece was republished with permission from the Inter-American Dialogue’s daily Latin America Advisor.

About the Author

Matt Ferchen

Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy

Ferchen specializes in China’s political-economic relations with emerging economies. At the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy, he ran a program on China’s economic and political relations with the developing world, including Latin America.

    Recent Work

  • Q&A
    How China Is Reshaping International Development

      Matt Ferchen

  • Article
    Why Unsustainable Chinese Infrastructure Deals Are a Two-Way Street

      Matt Ferchen, Anarkalee Perera

Matt Ferchen
Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Matt Ferchen
EconomyNorth AmericaSouth AmericaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    ASEAN-China Digital Cooperation: Deeper but Clear-Eyed Engagement

    ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

  • Commentary
    How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate Performance

    Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.

      Mathias Larsen

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.