Q&A
Matt Ferchen
{
"authors": [
"Matt Ferchen"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China and the Developing World",
"China’s Foreign Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"South America",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Will China Transfer More Technology to Latin America?
China’s economic slowdown has prompted Latin American and Chinese officials to seek new areas of cooperation, notably in agricultural technology and infrastructure.
By Matt Ferchen
Published on Nov 11, 2015
Source: Latin America Advisor
Inter-American Dialogue: China’s experience in developing technology could make the country an important partner in helping Latin American countries diversify their economies, according to an October 20 report by the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). How willing is China to share its expertise? Which countries in Latin America would benefit the most? To which sectors of Latin America’s economies should China provide targeted assistance? What economic lessons—and warnings—should Latin American countries learn from China?
Matt Ferchen: First, it’s important to note that ECLAC’s new report is about the region’s trade crisis. This crisis is directly linked to China’s own economic slowdown and changing growth model, both of which have affected the volume and price of some key Latin American commodity exports to China. This is in stark contrast to earlier ECLAC reports that emphasized the positive role that Chinese demand played in minimizing the impact of the global financial crisis on the region. The commodity boom, and what I’ve been calling the "easy phase" of China-Latin America relations (although they were clearly never that easy), is now obviously over and Latin America is dealing with the hangover. The end of the commodity boom provides the background and an explanation for why Latin American and Chinese officials and businesspeople are now more actively discussing ways to cooperate on new forms of trade and investment, including infrastructure and more high-tech trade. However, the likelihood that China will transfer any of its key manufacturing technologies to Latin America is very limited since this would undercut China’s own competitiveness. That said, technological upgrading in agricultural and food-based export industries is one area where cooperation is possible since Chinese demand for imports in this sector will likely remain strong. The ECLAC report argues that Latin America can learn from Chinese "long-term visions" and state support for technological upgrading, yet Chinese concerns about insufficient "innovation" and inefficient state-owned enterprises should lead to more careful evaluations of the real sources of China’s economic dynamism past and present.
About the Author
Matt Ferchen
Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Ferchen specializes in China’s political-economic relations with emerging economies. At the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy, he ran a program on China’s economic and political relations with the developing world, including Latin America.
- How China Is Reshaping International Development
- Why Unsustainable Chinese Infrastructure Deals Are a Two-Way StreetArticle
Matt Ferchen, Anarkalee Perera
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- The Plaza Accord and Its Relevance for ChinaCommentary
The Plaza Accord was not an externally imposed punishment of Japan but part of a broader restructuring that Japanese economists and policymakers themselves recognized was necessary. Its effects were undermined, however, when Tokyo responded to the resulting slowdown with policies that exacerbated investment, credit expansion, and the very imbalances the adjustment was intended to resolve.
Michael Pettis
- Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its AlliesPaper
The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
