Paper
Douglas H. Paal
{
"authors": [
"Douglas H. Paal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [
"China’s Foreign Relations",
"U.S.-China Relations"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
TPP Is in a Coma and China Stands to Gain
The prospects for the Trans-Pacific Partnership look dim in the face of a Trump administration, which may open opportunities for China to take the lead in the Pacific region.
Published on Nov 17, 2016
Source: CNBC
Speaking to CNBC, Carnegie’s Douglas H. Paal stated his perspectives on the future of the TPP in the wake of Trump’s electional victory and transition into the presidency.
“I think the situation is one were the American people really want to see him show big change, and he can’t ignore that promise, that expectation,” Paal said. “But at the same time, you can’t tear the temple down and expect to be able to have services, to be able to do business. So it’s going to come out somewhere in between.
“We’re at the point where nobody is sending really clear signals from the Trump transition: it’s the usual three to four weeks of chaos before the main players are identified and they start to impose order on the process. And so I think it’s something you have to ride through for a little while until we get better direction from the administration.”
When asked about whether the TPP can survive in any way without U.S. involvement, Paal said, “Probably not, though I think they can make an effort. They are going to have a meeting at APEC in Lima, Peru, this weekend and the eleven other members will explore whether there’s some way to bring it together. But the big draw to TPP was getting into the American market and getting America into the other markets—and that is missing now. I would describe TPP as in a coma—it is not dead, but it’s not showing great prospects either.
“Interestingly, this is going to give a chance to China to take the lead as the responsible stakeholder in the Pacific. They’re the signers of the climate control document that’s now being questioned by the Trump team; they’re the people who got a free trade Asia-Pacific proposal, which they borrowed from the U.S. back in the 90’s, and are now taking forward, without the United States. So we may see a shift of leadership roles from the Obama administration and its pivot to Asia, to China and something else.”
About the Author
Douglas H. Paal
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
- America’s Future in a Dynamic Asia
- U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year MarkQ&A
- +1
Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
- Why Vietnam Is Swinging in China’s DirectionCommentary
Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang
