• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Srinath Raghavan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Domestic Politics"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Why CAG and Modi Government’s Claims of Rafale Deal Being Cheaper are Open to Debate

Recent revelations about the Rafale deal have all focused on one central question: was the contract for 36 aircrafts secured by the NDA government on better terms than the older UPA negotiations for 126 medium multi-role combat aircrafts, especially with respect to cost and delivery time?

Link Copied
By Srinath Raghavan
Published on Feb 19, 2019

Source: Print

Recent revelations about the Rafale deal have all focused on one central question: Was the contract for 36 aircraft secured by the NDA government on better terms than the older UPA negotiations for 126 medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA), especially with respect to cost and delivery time?

Two documents made public Wednesday throw further light on these issues. The Hindu reproduced an eight-page dissenting note by three members of the Indian Negotiating Team (INT), claiming that the contract for the 36 aircraft was not on better terms. The CAG report tabled in Parliament, on the other hand, asserts that the government did manage to secure a better deal—but to a lesser extent than it claimed.

Read the Full Article

This article was originally published in the Print.

About the Author

Srinath Raghavan

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Security Studies Program

Srinath Raghavan is a nonresident senior fellow at Carnegie India. His primary research focus is on the contemporary and historical aspects of India’s foreign and security policies.

    Recent Work

  • Paper
    Recovery, Resilience, and Adaptation: India From 2020 to 2030
      • +3

      Rajesh Bansal, Anirudh Burman, Rudra Chaudhuri, …

  • Commentary
    View From New Delhi

      Srinath Raghavan

Srinath Raghavan
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Security Studies Program
Srinath Raghavan
Domestic PoliticsIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    The Challenges Behind China’s Global South Policies

    While China will remain a significant political and economic force in the Global South, its ambition to leverage the Global South as a counterbalance to the United States and the Global North is far from assured.

      Xue Gong

  • Commentary
    Renewed Clashes on the China-India Border

    Can China and India disengage from contested territories along the border?

      • +1

      Paul Haenle, Ashley J. Tellis, Han Hua, …

  • Commentary
    India’s New Crypto Proposals Should Worry Virtual Currency Fans

    The government extends the uncertainty with its two new taxes and digital rupee.

      Anirudh Burman, Priyadarshini D.

  • Commentary
    What Trump’s Trip to India Means for China

    India manages a delicate balancing act between the United States and China, but in several key areas, the three giants could advance shared interests.

      Lu Yang

  • Commentary
    What Will Happen At the India-China Summit?

    Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi are meeting on October 11, 2019. The summit in Mamallapuram, India, is a chance to work through the recent strains in the two countries’ relationship.

      Han Hua

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.