Other
François Godement, Ashley J. Tellis
{
"authors": [
"François Godement"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
The China-US Trade “War”: China on the Trump Roller-Coaster
Chinese sources are showing varying views on trade tensions with the United States, both from different perspectives and over time: even the Party line itself may change.
Published on Dec 13, 2019
Source: Institut Montaigne
Chinese sources cannot be directly compared with the analysis and opinions of Western economists since the media and, to a lesser extent, expert opinion are controlled by the Party-state. Yet there have been varying views, both from different perspectives and over time: even the Party line itself may change. The tone can range from realist caution to war cries – indeed, one of our sources uses the term "war" 54 times in the course of one single article.
According to the CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), the largest academic online library in China, more than 3000 pieces were published on these trade frictions between 1982 and October 2018. More notably, 1800 out of 3000 were published in only nine months of 2018… Our selection runs from the spring of 2018 to the fall of 2019, covering only a tiny fraction of publications. Earlier views – from the spring of 2017, when Donald Trump raised the trade issue and the possibility of tariffs – had generally been optimistic, based on China’s economic strength and also on the belief that China could deal with a savvy businessman turned president.
Initial optimism faded in April 2018
In April 2018, after Donald Trump announces a 25% tariff increase on 50 billion USD of Chinese goods, the tone is more subdued. One view, taking into account rising tech barriers, explains that "the US overall strength still prevails, and there are still obvious shortcomings in China’s technologies".1 Another view underlines that China’s large trade surplus puts the country in a disadvantageous bargaining position. To minimize losses and constrain the US, explains the author, it should shift the battle field and pick the weak point in the US position: finance. For the author, the logic is simple: America is a deficit spending country, its lack of money and debt financing model are fatal weaknesses. China on the other hand has abundant capital.
This article was originally published by Institut Montaigne.
About the Author
François Godement
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Godement, an expert on Chinese and East Asian strategic and international affairs, was a nonresident senior fellow in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
- Reorienting China Policy By Working With Europe
- China at the Gates: A New Power Audit of EU-China RelationsIn The Media
François Godement, Abigaël Vasselier
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian
- The Xi Doctrine Zeros in on “High-Quality Development” for China’s Economic FutureCommentary
In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.
Damien Ma
- When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly NonpartisanCommentary
For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.
Elina Noor
