• Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
March Elections: United Voting Day in Russia

Source: Getty

Article
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

March Elections: United Voting Day in Russia

The March elections in Russia were more honest and transparent than those held in October, but they were still not open; independent and opposition candidates were once again denied the right to run.

Link Copied
By Nikolay Petrov
Published on Mar 15, 2010

The elections on March 14 were honest or at least relatively honest, though not exactly fair.

As far as the unfairness goes, the authorities made mass use of their administrative resources to put candidates not to their liking out of the running, and in this sense the elections differed little from those held last autumn. As a result, for the most part, only candidates from the parties represented in the Duma actually made it onto the lists.

Where these elections differed from those of October 2009 was in the way the votes were counted. There were no serious reproaches made in this respect. United Russia lost face somewhat as a result, collecting substantially fewer votes overall than in October, but the president was able to save face, after having promised after the last elections to do something about administrative intervention in voting.

The mayoral election in Irkutsk shows that this kind of clumsy intervention can produce quite the opposite results for the authorities. At first, United Russia, hoping to please the newly appointed governor from Saint Petersburg, decided to put forward a non-local candidate. But when the surveys showed that this non-local candidate had far less support than another United Russia member, a populist who decided to run on his own initiative, the election commission came up with a pretext to remove this stronger rival from the running. The result was to consolidate voting in favor of the only remaining relatively independent candidate in the running – from the Communist Party – who won by a wide margin.

In terms of positive developments it is good that the authorities are renouncing the one-and-a-half party model tested in the election to the Moscow City Duma, and returning to the previous four-party model. The negative trend is that we see a complete elimination of parties at the liberal end of the political spectrum. In these elections, Yabloko, for some time now no longer represented as a party at federal level, lost its party representation at regional level too. The Union of Right Forces (SPS) had already disappeared from the scene earlier, and Right Cause never really got off the ground. The result is that not only are these parties marginalized, but a large group of voters now have no one representing their interests.

Nikolay Petrov
Former Scholar-in-Residence, Society and Regions Program, Moscow Center
Nikolay Petrov

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    ASEAN-China Digital Cooperation: Deeper but Clear-Eyed Engagement

    ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Damien Ma Joins Carnegie China as Director

    Damien Ma is taking the helm as director of Carnegie China, the Carnegie Endowment’s East Asia-based research center.

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.