Article
Deborah Gordon, Smriti Kumble, David Livingston
{
"authors": [
"David Livingston"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SCP",
"programs": [
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [
"Carnegie Oil Initiative"
],
"regions": [
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Climate Change"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
OPEC Panel Discussion
OPEC’s decision to maintain production levels despite falling prices was a surprise to many in the energy industry.
Published on Apr 25, 2015
Source: World Affairs Council of Houston
Led by Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s decision to maintain production levels despite falling prices was a surprise to many in the energy industry. Various reasons for OPEC’s decision have been put forth such as a desire to discourage U.S. shale production or to undermine Iran’s oil based economy.
Panelists James B. Adams, Chris Faulkner, Pradeep Anand and David Livingston discussed the possible rational behind OPEC’s decision, what this means for the markets and the oil producing countries, and what we can expect for the near future.
This event was originally published by the World Affairs Council of Houston.
About the Author
David Livingston
Former Associate Fellow, Energy and Climate Program
Livingston was an associate fellow in Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where his research focuses on emerging markets, technologies, and risks.
- Advancing Public Climate Engineering Disclosure
- Working Around Trump on ClimateCommentary
Erik Brattberg, David Livingston
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Carnegie China Scholars on the Biden-Xi MeetingCommentary
Carnegie China scholars share their assessment of the Biden-Xi meeting and its implications for U.S.-China relations going forward.
- +1
Paul Haenle, Xue Gong, Ngeow Chow Bing, …
- Biden and Xi Meet at APECCommentary
Southeast Asian capitals would prefer that the U.S. and PRC manage their relationship, if not get along.
Paul Haenle, Chong Ja Ian
- Amid Contending Narratives, A Read on U.S. and PRC Messaging in SingaporeArticle
As the world undergoes a new round of fragmentation and major power rivalry that includes the advancing of divergent visions of global order, Singapore is discovering that its interests are increasingly being pulled in different directions.
Chong Ja Ian
- Vietnam’s Response to China’s Global Security InitiativeCommentary
There is a certain level of restraint, but there is also a lingering distrust.
Paul Haenle, Huong Le Thu
- Missile Defense and the Strategic Relationship among the United States, Russia, and ChinaCommentary
China views U.S. missile defense as posing a greater potential threat to China’s nuclear deterrent than other U.S. military capabilities.
Tong Zhao, Dmitry Stefanovich
