• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "pressRelease",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Press Release

Promise, Peril for U.S. in India-Pakistan Rivalry

Link Copied
Published on May 28, 2002

Source: Carnegie

For Immediate Release: May 28, 2002
Contact: Scott Nathanson, 202-939-2211, snathanson@ceip.org

Promise, Peril for U.S. in India-Pakistan Rivalry
Experts Urge U.S. to Use Ties to Promote Nuclear Stability

In the wake of reports that top U.S. officials believed Pakistan may have mobilized its nuclear forces in the India-Pakistan border conflict of 1999, a timely Carnegie Endowment working paper calls on Washington to use its influence on the subcontinent to promote nuclear stability. Based on policy briefs and discussions commissioned and organized by the Stanley Foundation in October 2001, "A New Equation: U.S. Policy toward India and Pakistan after September 11" both cautions and guides the U.S. role in this 21st century game of nuclear brinkmanship. "Tensions in South Asia are increasing dangerously," says Joseph Cirincione, director of the Carnegie Non-Proliferation Project. "This paper is an essential reminder that the war on terror must complement, not supplant, the work to prevent the spread or use of nuclear weapons."

The preface and first essay are by former Carnegie Endowment visiting scholar Lee Feinstein, who was a member of the State Department team charged with responding to the 1998 India-Pakistan nuclear tests. His essay examines the uncharted territory of simultaneous strong U.S. relations with India and Pakistan since 9/11. Feinstein urges the administration to resist ignoring nonproliferation issues, noting that key decisions by India and Pakistan on their nuclear programs remain open. The second essay, by James Clad, evaluates the foreign policy objectives of India and Pakistan and notes that the "strange outcome" of 9/11 might provide an "unexpected chance to get down to fundamentals" over Kashmir.

The third essay, by Lewis Dunn, identifies new and enduring nonproliferation priorities for U.S. policymakers. Dunn pays special attention to the tension between promoting programs intended to enhance nuclear security, and the requirement to observe legal prohibitions on nuclear assistance to India and Pakistan. The final essay, by David Albright, examines the security of Pakistani nuclear weapons and technology in light of the increased concern over nuclear terrorism and the prospect of an "Islamic bomb."

For copies, contact pubs@ceip.org, or go online at www.ceip.org/pubs.

Lee Feinstein, former deputy head of the State Department's Policy Planning Staff, is a Transatlantic Fellow at the German Marshall Fund. James Clad is the former Henry R. Luce Foundation Research Professor of Southeast Asian Studies in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Lewis A. Dunn is senior vice president at Science Applications International Corporation. David Albright is president and founder of the Institute for Science and International Security.

# # #

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Macron Makes France a Great Middle Power

    France has stopped clinging to notions of being a great power and is embracing the middle power moment. But Emmanuel Macron has his work cut out if he is to secure his country’s global standing before his term in office ends.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    How Can Europe Renew a Stalled Enlargement Process?

    Despite offering security benefits to candidates and the EU alike, the enlargement agenda appears stalled. Why is progress not being made, and is it time for Europe to rethink its approach?

      Sylvie Goulard, Gerald Knaus

  • Turkey Erdogan Caucasus Central Asia
    Article
    How Turkey Can Help the Economies of the South Caucasus to Diversify

    Over the past two decades, regional collaboration in the South Caucasus has intensified. Turkey and the EU should establish a cooperation framework to accelerate economic development and diversification.

      • Feride Inan
      • Güven Sak
      • Berat Yücel

      Feride İnan, Güven Sak, Berat Yücel

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor Transition

    Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.

      Amanda Coakley

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Can Europe Still Matter in Syria?

    Europe’s interests in Syria extend beyond migration management, yet the EU trails behind other players in the country’s post-Assad reconstruction. To boost its influence in Damascus, the union must upgrade its commitment to ensuring regional stability.

      Bianka Speidl, Hanga Horváth-Sántha

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.