{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "democracy",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "DCG",
"programs": [
"Democracy, Conflict, and Governance",
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Lebanon",
"Syria",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Democracy",
"Economy",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
In view of the current conflict between Lebanon and Israel, policy makers should highlight the importance of domestic political reform in the Middle East.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 17, 2006
In view of the current conflict between Lebanon and Israel, policy makers should highlight the importance of domestic political reform in the Middle East. A new paper from the Carnegie Endowment’s Middle East Program, Reform in Syria: Steering between the Chinese Model and Regime Change, explores the external-internal tangle that is Syrian politics—its recent history, efforts at economic and administrative reform, opposition parties and coalitions, and the priorities for and obstacles to meaningful democratic reform. This paper is the latest contribution to the Carnegie Paper series on Arab political reform. Click here to read the paper or here to access the entire series.
The author underscores that while the Syrian regime is not averse to change, it wants reforms to take place in a slow, steady manner, to avoid the loss of political control. Syrian government officials explicitly seek to emulate the Chinese model of reform, which promoted economic reform and modernization in many sectors while the Chinese Communist Party retained complete political control. The Syrians are determined to avoid the experiences of Eastern Europe and the former USSR, where modest political openings quickly mushroomed into regime collapse. The author lays out the priorities for reform, describes the obstacles these reforms face, and explicates Syria’s internal weak and divided opposition.
The paper suggests to policy makers the three most likely political scenarios for Syria’s future: the existing power structure will prevail; an internal coup by the Alawites in the military will occur; or the regime will experience a complete collapse, leading to a difficult period of instability because of the weakness of the Syrian opposition.
The international community is faced with many uncertainties and challenges in Syria and immediate regime change is not likely to bring about positive results. The United States and European countries are more likely to succeed in promoting positive change in the long run if they take the following steps:
Direct link to pdf: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/CEIP_CP_69_final.pdf
The Democracy and Rule of Law Program’s Middle East Series examines the governmental makeup and political reform of various countries in the region. For other papers in the series or to learn more about Carnegie’s Middle East program go to www.CarnegieEndowment.org/MiddleEast.
Contact: Jennifer Linker, (tel) +1 202/939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
###
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.
Konark Bhandari
This piece argues that the present Indian strategy, based on opportunistic diversification and utilization of limited strategic reserves, remains inadequate when confronting supply disruptions. It evaluates India’s options in the short, medium, and long terms.
Vrinda Sahai
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …