• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Nikolay Petrov"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The Same Old Presidential Reserve

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev inherited a broken government bureaucracy unable to recruit skilled workers when he took office. Medvedev's proposed solution to create a national database of qualified candidates does not address the fact that there is no place for a truly transparent and merit-based recruiting process in Putin's political system.

Link Copied
By Nikolay Petrov
Published on Aug 5, 2008

Source: The Moscow Times

Two weeks ago, President Dmitry Medvedev addressed a group of key aides and selected ministers about the acute need for attracting more qualified people to serve in government. Although Medvedev admitted that the government lacks an effective system to recruit people possessing the necessary managerial and administrative skills, the solutions he proposed are unlikely to solve the fundamental problems that make the government so ineffective and incompetent.

Medvedev said the Soviet bureaucracy's system for recruiting personnel, with its "obvious shortcomings" and "particular strengths," no longer works. In reality, the system for building bureaucratic cadres is even more dilapidated now than it ever was, and nothing has emerged to replace it. The system the bureaucratic elite built in the 1930s was driven by fear and widespread denunciations, and it required occasional bloodlettings and unpredictable staffing cuts to keep things running smoothly. After Stalin's death, the system continued to be run by inertia alone, worsening over time.

Under Boris Yeltsin, the system for recruiting bureaucrats initially underwent a major revision without any bloodletting. But over time, everything gradually fell into the same old pattern. The bureaucratic elite's old system was never dismantled; it was just "modernized" somewhat to fit into the new post-Soviet era. In the 1990s, high-ranking bureaucrats were able to gain unprecedented wealth, using their government positions to obtain ownership in major state assets in shady privatization deals.

During Vladimir Putin's two terms in office, the issue of improving the competence of government personnel received a lot of attention. In particular, Putin renewed the practice of horizontally rotating the appointments in the regions, such as the chief of police, the prosecutor general and principal federal inspectors. The Kremlin also toyed with the idea of rotating governors to maintain their loyalty and to keep them from becoming answerable to the regional political elite.

Medvedev's principal proposal to solve the cadre problem is to create a "presidential reserve" of highly qualified personnel for positions in the federal and regional governments. According to the proposal, Medvedev will oversee the selection process of key government appointments. They will be recruited from a publicly accessible database that will supposedly contain the country's most qualified professional and managers from both government and business ranks.

But is there anything new here that differs from the system Medvedev criticized for its inherent incompetence, nepotism and corruption? The fundamental problem is that there is no place for a truly transparent and merit-based selection personnel recruiting process in Putin's political system -- a system Medvedev actively helped construct. Thus, Medvedev's presidential reserve will differ little, if at all, from the cadres he has criticized.

The bureaucratic elite rely on a caste system. Every bureaucrat's job -- and, more important, the extra "unofficial income" earned on the side that far exceeds official salaries -- is dependent on the goodwill of his boss. These perquisites are bestowed on subordinates based on a strict code of loyalty to their bosses.

When Medvedev raised the issue of incompetence among bureaucrats at the meeting, all of the president's envoys to the regions were present. The envoys were present because thousands of appointments of federal officials in the regions are made through them every year, although the process is largely a formality. Further, the envoys are responsible for recommending candidates for gubernatorial posts, although it is well known that their suggestions carry little weight.

Don't expect a new-and-improved class of bureaucrats under Medvedev's presidency. Most likely, we can expect more of the same old inefficiency, favoritism and incompetence.

This article appeared in The Moscow Times.

About the Author

Nikolay Petrov

Former Scholar-in-Residence, Society and Regions Program, Moscow Center

Nikolay Petrov was the chair of the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Society and Regions Program. Until 2006, he also worked at the Institute of Geography at the Russian Academy of Sciences, where he started to work in 1982.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Moscow Elections: Winners and Losers

      Nikolay Petrov

  • Commentary
    September 8 Election As a New Phase of the Society and Authorities' Coevolution

      Nikolay Petrov

Nikolay Petrov
Former Scholar-in-Residence, Society and Regions Program, Moscow Center
Nikolay Petrov
Political ReformCaucasusRussia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Paper
    India’s Sustained Economic Recovery Will Require Changes to Its Bankruptcy Law

    As India’s economy recovers from the coronavirus pandemic, Indian businesses need efficient financial structures to regain their ground. Key reforms to India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code could fill these gaps.

      Anirudh Burman

  • Paper
    Cross-Border Data Access for Law Enforcement: What Are India’s Strategic Options?

    Access to cross-border data is an integral piece of the law enforcement puzzle. India is well placed to lead the discussions on international data agreements subject to undertaking necessary surveillance reforms.

      Smriti Parsheera, Prateek Jha

  • Article
    The BRI in Post-Coronavirus South Asia

    After the coronavirus pandemic wanes, how will China’s reorientation of the Belt and Road Initiative to address global health concerns influence its relationships with South Asian countries?

      Deep Pal, Rahul Bhatia

  • Commentary
    India’s Unheeded Coronavirus Warning

    Early in the outbreak, government researchers forecast several high-risk scenarios that were downplayed or ignored in public messaging.

      Gautam I. Menon

  • Article
    Intrusive Pandemic-Era Monitoring Is the Same Old Surveillance State, Not a New One

    Governments around the world are turning to new forms of digital surveillance to monitor the spread of the coronavirus, though they are mostly using existing laws to do so.

      Anirudh Burman

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.