• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Karim Sadjadpour"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Iran",
    "Gulf"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Domestic and International Pressures Build in Iran

The recent UN sanctions may have been diluted by the strategic interests of members of the UN Security Council, but they could have a stronger impact if they lead to more unilateral sanctions from European countries.

Link Copied
By Karim Sadjadpour
Published on Jun 14, 2010

Source: The Diane Rehm Show

A year after the controversial June 12, 2009 presidential elections, the Iranian opposition seems to be operating out of sight. The regime, which has a monopoly on coercion in Iran, has violently crushed the opposition whenever it has taken to the streets. However, the lack of street protests may not be a bad thing for the opposition because, as Carnegie's Karim Sadjadpour noted, “street protests accentuate the weakness of the opposition.” He suggested that the opposition should move beyond street protests and reach out to workers in Iran, in particular those who work in the oil industry, in order to initiate strikes. 

The recent UN sanctions are, Sadjadpour contended, “a starting point, not a finishing line.” In other words, he explained, UN sanctions are generally passed on a lowest common denominator formula because of the strategic interests of states like Russia and China. However, the hope is that these new sanctions will lead to more unilateral sanctions from European countries. “The question is, will these sanctions change the calculations of the regime in regards to their nuclear program,” said Sadjadpour, “and the past thirty years shows the regime is willing to subject its people to economic hardship rather than compromise ideologically.”

Moving forward, Sadjadpour saw three broad challenges for the Obama administration in regards to Iran:

  1. Reaching a modus vivendi with a regime that derives legitimacy from its antagonism toward the United States.
  2. Engaging the regime without demoralizing the opposition
  3. Supporting the opposition without tainting its independence. 

About the Author

Karim Sadjadpour

Senior Fellow, Middle East Program

Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.

    Recent Work

  • Q&A
    What’s Keeping the Iranian Regime in Power—for Now

      Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour, Robin Wright

  • Q&A
    How Washington and Tehran Are Assessing Their Next Steps

      Aaron David Miller, David Petraeus, Karim Sadjadpour

Karim Sadjadpour
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour
Political ReformNuclear PolicyMiddle EastIranGulf

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    Risk and Retaliation: Israel, Iran, and the Evolving Situation in West Asia

    An Israeli response to Iran’s October 1 attack is imminent. The key question is of its intensity and potential fallout, both within Iran, in terms of nuclear security policy changes, and across the broader region. The coming days are likely to reshape West Asia irreversibly.

      Gaddam Dharmendra

  • Commentary
    How WHO’s “One Health” Program Can Help India Tackle Monkeypox

    With monkeypox being declared a global health emergency, the WHO approach is an innovative and effective way to curb outbreaks of zoonotic diseases.

      Shruti Sharma

  • Paper
    Lessons from the Coronavirus Pandemic: Leveraging Biotechnology to Tackle Infectious Diseases in India

    In India, biotechnology has played an important role in helping stakeholders in academia, industry, and government develop new pandemic-related technology, from test kits to respiratory devices. But these biotechnology advancements can go further to strengthen India’s public health capacity.

      Shruti Sharma

  • Commentary
    Combating Vaccine Hesitancy in India

    Unless the government can up its communications game, anti-vax movements could prolong India’s pandemic effects.

      Shruti Sharma

  • Commentary
    How Should Countries Study Viruses Safely?

    The uncertain origin of the coronavirus has focused attention on gain-of-function research—studying viruses to learn how they spread. How can countries work together to ensure stringent safety standards?

      Shruti Sharma

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.