Research
- +6
Yasmine Farouk, Nathan J. Brown, Maysaa Shuja Al-Deen, …
{
"authors": [
"Michele Dunne"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Palestine",
"Levant"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Let Fatah Talk to Hamas
The Gaza flotilla incident highlights not only the unsustainability of the closure of Gaza, but also the unsustainability of the U.S. position discouraging reconciliation between the Palestinian factions, Fatah and Hamas.
Published on Jun 1, 2010
Source: The New York Times
The United States says it favors a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and institution building for a Palestinian state, but those outcomes will require unified Palestinian leadership that enjoys adequate support in both the West Bank and Gaza.
President Mahmoud Abbas cannot take risks in negotiations with Israel partly because his mandate is so slim; he exerts control over only fragments of the West Bank and none of Gaza and he is also long past the end of his electoral term.
The suspension of the elected Palestinian Legislative Council since the 2007 rift between Fatah and Hamas also makes institution building difficult. How can the Palestinian Authority undertake sustainable reforms when it cannot legislate? And meanwhile, Gaza has been drifting off in its own dangerously separate direction under Hamas leadership.
For the past 20 years, the United States has sought one short-term Israeli-Palestinian negotiating breakthrough after another — few of which have yielded real or lasting progress — while working to postpone, frustrate, or manipulate internal Palestinian politics in order to serve the negotiations.
The United States need not engage Hamas directly while the group continues to advocate armed struggle against Israel. But it is time for the United States to tolerate the internal Palestinian political competition and bargaining that will be necessary to reunite the West Bank and Gaza and to support real institution building for a future state.
The United States should stop impeding reconciliation efforts such as those recently exerted by Egypt, cease providing excuses to the Ramallah leadership for avoiding compromise, and signal its willingness to tolerate a modus vivendi between Fatah and Hamas as well as Palestinian elections.
The Obama administration should look for ways to continue cooperation with and assistance to a Palestinian Authority that includes Hamas, as long as that Authority is willing to prevent terrorism and allow the P.L.O. to negotiate with Israel.
About the Author
Michele Dunne
Former Nonresident Scholar, Middle East Program
Michele Dunne was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s Middle East Program, where her research focuses on political and economic change in Arab countries, particularly Egypt, as well as U.S. policy in the Middle East.
- Islamic Institutions in Arab States: Mapping the Dynamics of Control, Co-option, and Contention
- From Hardware to Holism: Rebalancing America’s Security Engagement With Arab StatesResearch
- +8
Robert Springborg, Emile Hokayem, Becca Wasser, …
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- A Halting Turn: India’s Military TransformationCommentary
In any defense establishment, change is an ongoing process. However, despite the best of intentions, existing bureaucracies, bound by habit and years of socialization, have their limits in implementing transformative change.
Anit Mukherjee
- AI in Outer Space: Opportunities, Risks, and the Governance GapCommentary
How is AI reshaping space security, creating governance challenges, and where does international diplomacy stand today?
Tejas Bharadwaj, Almudena Azcárate Ortega
- Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with ChinaPaper
After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.
Saheb Singh Chadha
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
- India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible PathwaysArticle
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
