Olga Shumylo-Tapiola
{
"authors": [
"Olga Shumylo-Tapiola"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [
"Europe’s Eastern Neighborhood"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia",
"Europe",
"Eastern Europe",
"Caucasus",
"Ukraine"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Ukraine and Russia: Ever Closer Neighbors?
While there has been a reawakening of sorts between Russia and Ukraine, relations between the two remain essentially unbalanced and tensions over gas disputes and trade are likely to continue to undermine bilateral relations.
When he took power in the spring of 2010, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych was widely seen as a pro-Russian politician inclined to seek compromises with Moscow. Both sides expected his presidency to result in a normalization and stabilization of relations between Russia and Ukraine. Symbolic gestures such as the signing of the Kharkiv agreement, Ukraine’s renunciation of its aspirations for NATO membership, and a number of high-level visits between the two capitals seemed to confirm this initial impression. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that the current Ukrainian president, like all of his predecessors, will not toe Moscow’s line and relations between the two countries are slowly but surely sliding into deadlock.
Not long into Yanukovych’s first year in office it became apparent that Ukraine would be increasingly subjected to Russian pressure on integration projects, would be carried out on Russia’s terms, with Ukraine gaining in the short term, but losing out heavily in the long run. Yanukovych, however, began to seriously engage with the question of European integration, privileging negotiations on Ukraine’s Association Agreement with the European Union (EU), while snubbing the possibility of joining Moscow’s Customs Union, a project that is dear to Russia and especially to Prime Minister Putin. These European aspirations have caused considerable disquiet in the Kremlin and Russian experts now argue that Ukraine’s leadership and elite send confusing messages to Moscow and that the country remains Russia’s most unpredictable partner in the post-Soviet space.
In sum, while there has been a reawakening of sorts between Moscow and Kyiv, relations between the two remain essentially unbalanced. Russia consistently expects more of its neighbor to the west and is consistently disappointed. Ukraine has two main concerns—cheaper gas and less attention from Russia—neither of which have been forthcoming.
Whether Kyiv and Moscow will be able to overcome this deadlock and build a stable and healthy relationship remains open to question. The current level of expectations on both sides, the lack of strategy, and the mutual distrust all suggest that relations between Ukraine and Russia will be fraught in the coming years. The people-to-people contacts that exist between Ukraine and Russia will serve as a guarantee against any military intervention by Moscow. However, disputes over gas, prompted by the introduction of higher gas prices for Ukraine, or trade wars, prompted by the finalization of EU-Ukraine talks on the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA), are likely to follow.
The nature of Ukraine’s agenda for Russia remains an open question, but ultimately Kyiv must find a vision in order to rebuild its relations with Moscow and end the tensions.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Associate, Carnegie Europe
Shumylo-Tapiola is a nonresident associate at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where her research focuses on Eastern Europe and Eurasia.
- Ukraine Between East and WestCommentary
- Ukraine: Democracy Has a ChanceCommentary
Olga Shumylo-Tapiola
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai
- India-China Economic Ties: Determinants and PossibilitiesPaper
This paper examines the evolution of India-China economic ties from 2005 to 2025. It explores the impact of global events, bilateral political ties, and domestic policies on distinct spheres of the economic relationship.
Santosh Pai
- NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions SimmerCommentary
On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.
Tejas Bharadwaj
- TRUST and TariffsCommentary
The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.
Arun K. Singh
- Indian Airstrikes in Pakistan: May 7, 2025Commentary
On May 7, 2025, between 1:05 and 1:30 a.m. (IST), airstrikes carried out by the Indian Air Force hit nine locations inside Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK). It was codenamed Operation Sindoor.
Rudra Chaudhuri