Commentary
Dmitri Trenin
{
"authors": [
"Dmitri Trenin"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Still a Delicate Balance
While Vladimir Putin’s election to the presidency should not change the course of Russia’s foreign policy, his fate will largely depend on his government’s socio-economic and political performance.
Published on Mar 5, 2012
Source: New York Times
As president, his fate will largely depend on his government’s socio-economic and political performance. Thus, he will not want trouble with the United States. He can't be expected to offer Washington too many concessions on contentious issues, but he can be relied on to honor Russia’s commitments under the Afghanistan transit agreement.
There is also some room for cooperation on Syria and Iran, as long as the United States does not resort to force against Damascus and Tehran. In an even more positive vein, Putin may open up Russia, including its energy sector, to U.S. investments. If that happens, the U.S.-Russian relationship will begin maturing beyond the traditional politico-military sphere.There are risks, however. Putin’s victory at the polls is not being seen as either free or fair by many in the Russian opposition, including the protest movement. This has a bearing on the future president’s legitimacy, both at home and abroad. If the U.S. public is led to believe that Putin is, in fact, less than a fully legitimate head of Russia, this will constrain the Obama administration’s outreach to him, and to his government. This, in turn, would only confirm Putin’s belief that the United States is planning a regime change in Russia, and the reset will be reset.
Should — God forbid — the so far peaceful protests in Moscow degenerate into violent clashes, the relationship would deteriorate way beyond where it was in the wake of the 2008 Russia-Georgia war. This will not be a good thing for Russia, for its modernization agenda will be in jeopardy. Isolated in the West, Moscow would need to look to China for secondhand technology.
About the Author
Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
- Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space
- What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West RevealedCommentary
Dmitri Trenin
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
- India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible PathwaysArticle
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
- Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTACommentary
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
- India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 EraResearch
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
- +6
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai
