• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Bayram Balci"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Risks for Caucasus of U.S.-Russia Anti-Terrorism Cooperation

After the Boston bombings by two ethnically Chechen brothers, Russia is angling for added U.S. anti-terrorism support in its efforts to subdue the rebellious northern Caucasus region.

Link Copied
By Bayram Balci
Published on May 8, 2013

Source: Globalist

It is striking how Russia, led by President Putin, has been actively pushing for greater anti-terrorism cooperation with the United States since the Boston marathon bombing — irrespective of the open question about whether there were earlier failures of intelligence sharing that could have helped avoid it. But despite the deep the grief of the American people and the need for quick answers, Moscow should be engaged with discriminatingly.

Although cooperation is essential in this specific case, it would be counterproductive to let Putin take the lead in U.S.-endorsed counter-terrorism operations in a broader sense.

The impact of the Chechen Wars of the 1990s and the associated indiscriminate repression in the Northern Caucasus led to significantly greater support for violent jihad.

Caution is essential in drawing any firm conclusions while the police and intelligence investigation is ongoing. But it has so far failed to establish a definitive link between the bombing and the international jihadist rebellion in the Caucasus.

It is also important to note that the "Caucasus Emirate," the leading jihadist terrorist group in opposition to Moscow's rule in the North Caucasus region, has always targeted Russian interests, Russia's local allies and "apostates". Since 2007, they have almost completely stopped targeting civilians.

No links between the Tsarnaev brothers and the Caucasus Emirate have been confirmed. It seems most likely that the rookie terrorists succumbed to desperation and nihilism and acted alone by pure folly.Even though the younger brother got American citizenship, they failed to adapt effectively in the United States.

They should be seen in some respects as typical of the young Chechen generation: born in exile, shaped by family stories of deportation and oppression and instilled with a sense of war and desire for revenge.

For many Chechens, the war has never stopped. It's still going on, wherever they are.

The Boston terrorist attack demands again that Russia and the U.S. work together more closely to take a firm stand on stopping terrorism. This remains the case although Moscow and Washington hold divergent views on what constitutes terrorism and how it should be eradicated.

In the Russian Northern Caucasus, counter-terrorism efforts seek to tackle all kinds of resistance to Russian rule but are often pursued with disrespect for even the most basic human rights.Greater cooperation with the United States serves Putin's interests as he hopes that Washington will express less criticism of Russian operations in the Caucasus as a result. Chechen terrorism has until now had nothing to do with the United States directly.

And before getting involved further in Russian and Chechen issues, the U.S. administration should understand how Chechen terrorism is in many ways a reaction to Russian colonial and repressive rule that dates back to the middle of the 19th century.

Regardless of initial promises, the Soviet regime ended up doing much worse still.

Stalin's purges targeted over 50,000 Chechens in the 1930s. In 1944 the entire Chechen people were deported in freight wagons and disembarked in the steppes of Kazakhstan. A third of them died in the process. The rest survived in exile infected with rage.

Russian and Soviet terror was followed by Yeltsin's chaotic rule and then Putin's. The wars of 1994 and 1999 were fought in the name of independence. But the sacrifice of as many as 200,000 lives proved in vain as the "Chechen issue" remains very present for the Russian state and the Chechen people.Both Yeltsin and Putin should be seen as ultimately responsible for the atrocities carried out during the wars of the 1990s — as well as for the radicalization of a population that had previously been more secular and nationalist than any other Muslim province of the USSR.

Despite this complicated history it is vital that the United States and Russia increase cooperation to help make sure that this isolated act of terrorism remains just that.

But the American administration should be careful about the way it engages in centuries-long Russian-Chechen antagonism so as not to add anti-Americanism to Caucasian claims.

This article was originally published in the Globalist.

About the Author

Bayram Balci

Former Nonresident Scholar, Russia and Eurasia Program

Balci was a nonresident scholar in Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program, where his research focuses on Turkey and Turkish foreign policy in Central Asia and the Caucasus.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Ukrainian Crisis and Its Limited Impact on Turkish-Russian Relations

      Bayram Balci

  • Commentary
    The Ukraine Crisis’s Central Asian Echoes

      Bayram Balci, Daniyar Kosnazarov

Bayram Balci
Former Nonresident Scholar, Russia and Eurasia Program
SecurityNorth AmericaUnited StatesCaucasusRussia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?

    India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?

    On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    Military Lessons from Operation Sindoor

    The India-Pakistan conflict that played out between May 6 and May 10, 2025, offers several military lessons. This article presents key takeaways from Operation Sindoor and breaks down how India’s preparations shaped the outcome and what more is needed to strengthen future readiness.

      Dinakar Peri

  • Book
    India and the Sovereignty Principle: The Disaggregation Imperative

    This book offers a comprehensive analysis of India's evolving relationship with sovereignty in a complex global order. Moving beyond conventional narratives, it examines how the sovereignty principle shapes India's behavior across four critical domains—from traditional military power to contemporary data governance.

      Rudra Chaudhuri, Nabarun Roy

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.