Commentary
Nathan J. Brown
{
"authors": [
"Nathan J. Brown"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Members of Congress Urged to Cut Aid to Egypt
Members of Congress have begun to call for cuts in the $1.5 billion in military aid given to Egypt each year, as political violence increases in the country.
Published on Aug 19, 2013
Source: NPR
The Egyptian political scene is currently domestically focused and the last thing the political actors want to do is listen to outsider’s advice, explained Carnegie’s Nathan Brown on NPR. He stated that Egypt’s political actors are extremely focused on each other and involved in what they see as a struggle over Egypt’s identity and future, which, he added, is why the United States is having such a hard time influencing the military’s generals.Last week, the Egyptian military brushed off U.S. efforts to negotiate a peaceful compromise with opposition protestors. As the violence increases in Egypt, members of Congress have begun to call for cuts in the $1.5 billion in military aid given to the country each year.
“Most political actors do not see the United States as on their side and that even extends to the Egyptian military despite all that aid,” Brown explained. He said that the military leaders are convinced that the United States still looks at things in the country through the lens of the Morsi presidency that was just overthrown. The United States is too closely identified with Morsi, he contended.
Brown argued that if U.S.-Egyptian relations were to fall apart, Egyptian foreign policy would not radically change under the new regime but there would be far less coordination in regional security issues, such as terrorism and Arab-Israeli diplomacy. Cuts in U.S. aid would make diplomacy and American security policy harder to operate in the region, he added, concluding that the aid is a very important part of the Egyptian military’s calculations.
About the Author
Nathan J. Brown
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, is a distinguished scholar and author of nine books on Arab politics and governance, as well as editor of five books.
- Looking Past the Wall on Palestine-Israel
- Rubble is Israel’s Doctrine, Not a Case of ImprovisationCommentary
Nathan J. Brown
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
- India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible PathwaysArticle
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
- Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTACommentary
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
- India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 EraResearch
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
- +6
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai
