• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "Levant",
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Syria",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Global Governance"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Draft Resolution on Syria’s Chemical Weapons Underway

If the joint efforts of the United States and Russia in Syria are to succeed, they must attain a ceasefire between Bashar al-Assad’s armed forces and the opposition, and discover and destroy all chemical weapons in Syria.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Sep 16, 2013
Project hero Image

Project

Eurasia in Transition

Learn More

Source: ABC’s RN Drive

The foreign ministers of France, Britain and the United States are in Paris to begin drafting a resolution on Syria's chemical weapons, which will then be put to the UN security council. Meanwhile, the UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki Moon, will release the long-awaited report of UN weapons inspectors into last month's deadly gas attack on a suburb of Damascus.

Speaking on ABC radio, Carnegie Moscow Center’s Petr Topychkanov explained that at the moment there are two important preconditions for the joint efforts of the United States and Russia to succeed. The first, very difficult, precondition is to attain ceasefire between Bashar al-Assad’s armed forces and the opposition. The second challenge is to discover and destroy all chemical weapons in Syria.

In order to avoid possible U.S. suspicion over Russian intentions in Syria, Topychkanov expressed his belief that all operations leading to the elimination of Syria’s arsenal of chemical weapons will have to be undertaken in a transparent and verifiable manner and, most importantly, under UN auspices and in line with UN resolutions.

In case Syria does not accept all obligations and the UN conditions, Topychkanov said he does not see the prospects of U.S. intervention as likely, given U.S. budget constraints, human losses suffered in Iraq and Afghanistan, and  Congress’ awareness of existing constraints and possible consequences of yet another intervention in the Middle East region.

This interview was originally broadcast on ABC Radio.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Entanglement: Chinese and Russian Perspectives on Non-nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks
      • +3

      James M. Acton, Alexey Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, …

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
SecurityForeign PolicyGlobal GovernanceLevantNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastSyriaRussia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    AI in Outer Space: Opportunities, Risks, and the Governance Gap

    How is AI reshaping space security, creating governance challenges, and where does international diplomacy stand today?

      Tejas Bharadwaj, Almudena Azcárate Ortega

  • Paper
    Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with China

    After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.

      Saheb Singh Chadha

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor Cooperation

    The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.

      Shruti Mittal

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.