• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Russia",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Civil Society",
    "Religion"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The Other Value Gap

Today, the Russian leaders position themselves as defenders of Europe’s 19th century values which marked the continent’s heyday, against what they term as ultra-liberalism. The value gap between the EU and Russia has gained a new dimension.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin
Published on Jan 10, 2014

In Russia, during the first ten days in January the country virtually shuts down for mid-winter holidays. After the president's traditional New Year toast there are few political developments worth any attention. This year, Vladimir Putin addressed the nation from Khabarovsk in the Far East, an area badly hit in 2013 by record-high floods. This was the first time the president's address was broadcast live, and from a place other than Moscow, rather than having been recorded in the Kremlin. By traveling so far east in Russia, all the way to China's border and the Pacific coast, Putin appeared to be sending also a geopolitical message: Russia will keep a balance in its foreign policy between the Euro-Atlantic and the Asia-Pacific worlds.

After Khabarovsk, the president dashed to Volgograd, the scene of the double terrorist attack two days before, which had claimed three dozen lives. This move reminded some of Putin's first New Year trip to Chechnya in 2000, when the newly appointed acting president celebrated the start of the new millennium with the soldiers on the battlefield. To the sympathetic observers, Putin appeared as resolute and full of energy as at the beginning of his reign. To Putin's would-be detractors, the occasion was the grim evidence that the issue of terrorism was as alive as ever, and that the security of Russian citizens was not fully assured. In any event, Putin's 2014 New Year speech rhymed with his famous slogan that won him the presidency in 2000: kill the terrorists! The mission is still in progress.

There were other public remarks in this holiday season that are worth noting. Patriarch Kirill, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, made a televised appearance on Christmas Day, January 7. The outspoken Patriarch, known for his socially conservative views, went farther than before in criticizing the current trends in the West which he called anti-Christian and anti-religious. He put the blame for this directly on Western elites. These accusations are consonant with President Putin's own judgment on Europe as having lost the way. A small news item this week about a St. Petersburg assemblyman starting a new NGO to defend Serbian religious rights in Kosovo points in the direction of Russia's new push—promoting religious freedom in increasingly "post-Christian" Europe.

For years, European politicians criticized Russia for its human rights deficit. No conversation about EU-Russia relations was complete without a reference to the value gap which separated Russia from its neighbors to the west. The 2012 Pussy Riot case, in retrospect, looks like a turning point. From then on, the Russian leaders, spiritual and temporal, have been mounting a counter-push. They position themselves as defenders of Europe's 19th century values which marked the continent's heyday, against what they term as ultra-liberalism which they claim leads people astray. The value gap between the EU and Russia has gained a new dimension.

This gap is not perfect. Liberal trends have not all been snuffed out in Russia, and Russian conservatives count a number of potential allies in the EU countries. The Patriarch and the Pope have overlapping agendas, and their historic meeting looks more likely now than ever before. As 400,000 Russians went for Christmas shopping and skiing to Finland alone, dozens of thousands of others stood in line for 9 hours at Moscow's Our Savior Cathedral to see the Gifts of the Magi, the relics that had come from Mount Athos. Both within Russia and between Russia and Europe, there is a need for debate.

About the Author

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space

      Dmitri Trenin

  • Commentary
    What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West Revealed

      Dmitri Trenin

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Political ReformSecurityForeign PolicyCivil SocietyReligionRussiaWestern Europe

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTA

    The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead

      Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki

  • Article
    India’s Oil Security Strategy: Structural Vulnerabilities and Strategic Choices

    This piece argues that the present Indian strategy, based on opportunistic diversification and utilization of limited strategic reserves, remains inadequate when confronting supply disruptions. It evaluates India’s options in the short, medium, and long terms.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 Era
    Research
    India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 Era

    Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.

      • Sameer Lalwani
      • +6

      Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.