• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Wang Tao"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie China

Shared Energy Interests an Opportunity for Sino-Indian Cooperation

As different as their economic and political systems are, China and India have much more to learn from each other’s success, and much more to gain together, in securing their shared critical sea lanes and energy supply.

Link Copied
By Wang Tao
Published on May 23, 2014

Source: Diplomat

China and India are set to account for more than 30 percent of global energy demand by 2030. Both countries are overwhelmingly reliant on imports to feed this need—China is likely to rely on imports for 66 percent of its oil consumption by 2020, and India will become the world’s largest importer of coal by 2017.

The Strait of Malacca is a key oil chokepoint in Asia, where some 15 million barrels of oil per day were being transmitted in 2011, including 82 percent of China’s total oil imports. The Strait is also the key transit route for China’s energy imports and trade more broadly. For its part, India is also eager to look east for new oil and gas from the Americas. The geographic proximity of the two major emerging economies combined with their shared heavy use of sea lanes between the South China Sea and Indian Ocean is increasingly leading some to question whether the two nations will engage in a head-on competition for energy and maritime security in the region.

Last October, Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke of a “maritime silk road” in his first trip to Southeast Asia, aiming to promote economic cooperation between China and the ASEAN countries. That road could also be extended all the way west through the Indian Ocean towards Africa, just as China once did in the fifteenth century.

China’s growing presence in the Indian Ocean is obvious. It has been an active investor in the economies of littoral states, building deep sea ports in Pakistan, and naval bases in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar. Meanwhile India’s commitment to pursue joint oil exploration with Vietnam in the South China Sea has been a source of significant irritation to China.

The two nations’ growing ambitions in energy supply need not be a source of tension. There are many reasons for New Delhi and Beijing to work together in their energy security strategies rather than separately, and some progress has already been made in this regard.

The third China-India Strategic Economic Dialogue was held in March, and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang stressed the similarity in development conditions between the two countries. He appealed for greater collaboration, especially in the area of energy. The two nations are not only two of the world’s biggest energy consumers, but also among the world’s largest carbon emitters. These commonalities should give them incentive to collaborate rather than to compete.

China and India are already partners in the Sino-Myanmar natural gas pipeline project. Also involving South Korea and Myanmar, this project provides a powerful example of international cooperation in building major energy infrastructure to the benefit of all parties involved. Beyond sharing responsibility for its construction, a joint venture with partners from all four countries will also operate the pipeline in a move that should minimize geopolitical tensions and risks. This is not an isolated case; Chinese and Indian state oil companies established a joint venture in the oil sector in Syria in 2005.

In May 2013, China and India both gained non-Arctic country observer status in the Arctic Council. Like other nations, and despite the difficulties extraction in the Arctic poses, it is undeniable that both governments are very interested in the potential natural and gas resources. Both Chinese and Indian national oil companies are currently in talks with Russia’s Gazprom and Rosneft for oil and gas investment in the near Arctic area. Given the risks associated, it would make sense for both countries to form a consortium in the negotiation as they did in the Myanmar-China natural gas pipeline project.

The fact that China and India are both abundant in dirty coal—and in pursuit of oil and gas in global markets—could also strengthen their close bond in international climate change negotiations. The two countries share the dilemma of promoting economic development for over a billion people while addressing strong requests from the international community to reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuels. Cooperation on the basis of economic development and climate change mitigation would allow the two nations to defend their legitimate positions together—and avoid making decisions that gain at the other’s cost.

The world energy paradigm is shifting from conventional resources and technologies to new ones. In this new reality, China and India have a shared goal in securing energy supplies from the growing sources, including shale gas in the United States, and new oil and gas fields in Africa and South America. As different as their economic and political systems are, the two largest emerging nations have much more to learn from each other’s success, and much more to gain together, in securing their shared critical sea lanes and energy supply.

This article was originally published in the Diplomat.

About the Author

Wang Tao

Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy

Wang Tao was a nonresident scholar in the Energy and Climate Program based at the Carnegie–Tsinghua Center for Global Policy.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Xi’s Global Leadership Ambitions in the Trump Era

      Wang Tao

  • In The Media
    How the Paris Conference Is Driving China’s Gas and Oil Reforms

      Wang Tao, Yang Yifang

Wang Tao
Former Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie-Tsinghua Center for Global Policy
Wang Tao
Climate ChangeSouth AsiaIndiaEast AsiaChina

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?

    On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    The PSLV Setback: Restoring India’s Workhorse

    On January 12, 2026, India's "workhorse," the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle, experienced a consecutive mission failure for the first time in its history. This commentary explores the implications of this incident on India’s space sector and how India can effectively address issues stemming from the incident.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Commentary
    AI Adoption Journey for Population Scale

    Connecting real-world AI use cases across sectors such as health, education, agriculture, and livelihoods can help policymakers, innovators, and institutions align around a shared goal. This article looks at a framework ensuring that AI works for everyone.

      Shalini Kapoor, Tanvi Lall

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    Revisiting the Usage of Refurbished Equipment in India’s Semiconductor Ecosystem

    This article looks at the progress of the Semiconductor Laboratory fab modernization plan based on publicly available documents, and potential learnings for future upgrades to government-owned fabs and India’s larger semiconductor ecosystem, especially regarding the use of refurbished equipment.

      Shruti Mittal, Konark Bhandari

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.