In The Media
Lilia Shevtsova
{
"authors": [
"Lilia Shevtsova"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Undeterred, Putin Presses On
There are many Ukrainians, even in the southeast, who have grown accustomed to Ukrainian independence and would resist efforts to fragment Ukraine and force the annexation or creation of quasi-independent republics.
Published on May 5, 2014
Source: American Interest
The crisis in Ukraine is taking on an alarming—one could even say hopeless—dimension. The Ukrainian state has so far failed to control the situation in its Eastern regions, and the West has failed to stop the Kremlin’s aggression against Ukraine. The armed and well-organized pro-Russian separatists are continuing to plunge eastern Ukrainian towns deeper and deeper into chaos. Their goal is plain: call for local referenda and declare the independence of the Donetsk, Lugansk, and Kharkov “People’s Republics”, which will then ask Moscow to accept them into its warm embrace. On May 2, the Ukrainian interim government finally began an offensive on the stronghold of the pro-Russian militants in Slovyansk, and government forces have already overtaken checkpoints around the city, but it remains to be seen whether they will succeed in re-asserting control. And the Moscow-backed separatists can still strike back.
The recent round of U.S. and EU sanctions imposed on Russia have not only failed to prevent further escalation of violence and aggression; they have actually convinced the Kremlin to continue its Ukrainian Crusade. (This should come as no surprise: President Obama himself expressed his skepticism that the sanctions would work.) Putin now has further proof, if more were needed, that the West is disunited, that Germany is dragging its feet, and that the West is unwilling to make sacrifices and is fearful of the consequences of a Russian collapse in the face of truly crippling sanctions. While sanctions are already biting somewhat and have begun to deepen Russia’s recession; they will only force the Kremlin to rethink its position in the long term. In the short term, they will only strengthen Putin’s conviction that the price of backtracking would be higher than the toll exacted by them. “But this is irrational! Putin is mad!” So goes the lament of all too many emotionally excitable observers. No: Putin is more rational than most; his reason, however, is being directed toward ensuring his political survival in Russia.The joint press conference by President Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel on May 2 has proved that Merkel’s “gradualist” diplomatic approach has won the day. Both leaders expressed their readiness “to impose costs on Russia for its actions”, declaring that they will turn the sanctions screw further only if Russia “continues on its current course.” What this ambiguous language means is that the leaders of the world’s most powerful states have not decided yet where the “red line” for Kremlin mischief is drawn. This was no doubt an encouraging press conference for the Kremlin. ...
Read the full text of this article in the American Interest.
About the Author
Lilia Shevtsova
Former Senior Associate, Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program, Moscow Center
Shevtsova chaired the Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program at the Carnegie Moscow Center, dividing her time between Carnegie’s offices in Washington, DC, and Moscow. She had been with Carnegie since 1995.
- Putin Has Fought His Way Into a Corner
- How Long Russians Will Believe in Fairy Tale?Commentary
Lilia Shevtsova
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with ChinaPaper
After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.
Saheb Singh Chadha
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
- India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible PathwaysArticle
A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.
Rajiv Bhatia
- Emerging From the “Zombie State” of Trade Agreements: The India-EU FTACommentary
The India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is shaping up to be one of the most consequential trade negotiations, both economically and strategically. But, what’s in the agreement, what’s missing, and what will determine its success in the years ahead
Vrinda Sahai, Nicolas Köhler-Suzuki
- India and a Changing Global Order: Foreign Policy in the Trump 2.0 EraResearch
Trump 2.0 has unsettled India’s external environment—but has not overturned its foreign policy strategy, which continues to rely on diversification, hedging, and calibrated partnerships across a fractured order.
- +6
Milan Vaishnav, ed., Sameer Lalwani, Tanvi Madan, …
