• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Thomas de Waal"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "Middle East",
    "Türkiye",
    "Caucasus",
    "Armenia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Europe

Armenians Mark Centenary in Multiple Ways

The solemn day of April 24 is approaching, when Armenians will mark the centenary of the tragedy that befell their nation in 1915, known as the Armenian Genocide.

Link Copied
By Thomas de Waal
Published on Apr 22, 2015
Project hero Image

Project

Eurasia in Transition

Learn More

The solemn day of April 24 is approaching, when Armenians will mark the centenary of the tragedy that befell their nation in 1915, known as the Armenian Genocide.

The media and politicians are mainly obsessed with one approach to the centenary—the use or non-use of the term genocide, as if this one word defines everything about the Armenian experience of 1915 and Armenian-Turkish relations.

On April 22, Armenian-American political leaders reported with anger and disappointment that they had been briefed that President Obama will not use the word genocide in his April 24 statement.

Yet what the president of the Unites States say or does not say, primarily for present-day political reasons, should not change what Armenians know and how they commemorate their own history.

And thankfully there are multiple other imaginative commemorations by different Armenians that will inform the general public about this black historical episode. They are a reminder that there is no monolithic “Armenian diaspora,” but more than six million Armenians descended from the Ottoman Armenians of 1915, each with their own family history.

These are people who call what happened to their grandparents and great-grandparents the Armenian Genocide but who are less exercised by the politics of it.

The centenary is the occasion for the publication of a wave of memoirs telling the terrible vivid stories of Armenian survivors. One, Fragments of a Lost Homeland tells the story of an entire family, the Didilians. Two more, Four Years in the Mountains of Kurdistan and Goodbye Antoura are moving childhood memoirs of Armenian survivors of 1915. These human stories are worth a hundred press-releases by lobbying groups.

A more technologically advanced example of the same phenomenon is the 100 Lives project, a website of films and stories launched by the two Armenian entrepreneurs Ruben Vardanian and Noubar Afeyan. The Armenians who are recorded here are less defined by victimhood than celebrated for how they survived and what they have achieved. The website even has, Buzzfeed-style, an item on “24 unusual ways to commemorate the genocide centennial.”

In the same spirit, the intrepid Armenian photographer Scout Tufankjian, formerly Barack Obama’s campaign photographer, is producing a book about the Armenian diaspora from Argentina to Ethiopia.

Armenians are also commemorating the tragedy in the lands where it actually happened in what is now eastern Turkey. Ara Sarafian from the London-based Gomidas Institute led a tour across eastern Turkey. In the town of Bitlis he has helped win approval for a new William Saroyan Street, named after the American-Armenian writer whose family came from the town.

In the Kurdish-majority city of Diyarbakir, where the Kurdish HDP political party has gone further than any other force in Turkey in reaching out to the Armenians, the Istanbul-born Armenian pianist Raffi Bedrosyan will play a concert on April 24 in the restored Armenian church.

In Istanbul itself there will be a commemoration event on the evening of April 24 in the center of the city in Taksim Square. The Turkish government, having soured the atmosphere by scheduling competing commemorations for the Battle of Gallipoli on the same day, is somewhat correcting its mistake by helping to hold a ceremony at the Armenian Patriarchate.

It adds up to a diverse commemoration of this awful historical event that highlights Armenian creativity even as it mourns the dead of 1915.

About the Author

Thomas de Waal

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

De Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity
      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

  • Commentary
    Europolis, Where Europe Ends

      Thomas de Waal

Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Thomas de Waal
Foreign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesMiddle EastTürkiyeCaucasusArmenia

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Article
    What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?

    India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?

    On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.

      Konark Bhandari

  • Commentary
    The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil Imports

    This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions Simmer

    On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.

      Tejas Bharadwaj

  • Commentary
    TRUST and Tariffs

    The India-U.S. relationship currently appears buffeted between three “Ts”—TRUST, Tariffs, and Trump.

      Arun K. Singh

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.