- +10
Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …
{
"authors": [
"Moisés Naím"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "SAP",
"programs": [
"South Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"South Asia",
"Afghanistan"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Military",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
The Surprising Lt. Colonel Davis
The fact that the Afghanistan war is not going well is no surprise. The surprise is that, according to Lt. Col. Davis, it is going even worse.
Source: El País

What are the implications of all this? That the Afghanistan war is going badly is no surprise. The surprise is that, according to Davis, it is going even worse than we thought, and much worse than we are told in the far from encouraging reports from top American officers. Naturally, the other surprise is that an officer on active service has decided to run the risk of breaking the rules, disseminating his devastating evaluation of the situation, and denouncing what he considers the mendacity of top Pentagon officials. Even more surprising is the fact that Davis has not yet been punished for his actions. A Pentagon spokesman hastily denied an NBC report that an investigation had been opened against Davis.
One possibility is that the colonel enjoys the support and protection of a group of senior military officers, and is in some way acting as their spokesman, something that Davis stridently denies. Another possibility is that the Pentagon fears that a reprisal against Davis might spark a wave of protest, and only serve to boost the visibility and influence of his views.
Lastly, another surprise is that Colonel Davis does not believe that the US ought to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan in 2014, as President Obama has promised. For Davis, the strategy ought to be to leave strong military bastions located at strategic points, while changing the nature of the mission. The troops, he says, ought to concern themselves mainly with capturing — or killing — terrorists that may be using the country as a base of operations. This is a crude way of saying that there is no hope of Afghanistan developing into a peaceful, prosperous and democratic nation.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.
- The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 DaysResearch
- View From Latin AmericaCommentary
Moisés Naím
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- What Does the Strait of Hormuz’s Closure Mean?Commentary
In an interview, Roger Diwan discusses where the global economy may be going in the third week of the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.
Nur Arafeh
- Tehran’s Easy TargetsCommentary
In an interview, Andrew Leber discusses the impact the U.S. and Israeli war against Iran is having on Arab Gulf states.
Michael Young
- The Gulf Conflict and the South CaucasusCommentary
In an interview, Sergei Melkonian discusses Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s careful balancing act among the United States, Israel, and Iran.
Armenak Tokmajyan
- Syria Skirts the Conflict With IranCommentary
In an interview, Kheder Khaddour explains that Damascus is trying to stabilize its borders, but avoiding war isn’t guaranteed.
Michael Young
- Israel’s Forever WarsCommentary
The country’s strategy is no longer focused on deterrence and diplomacy, it’s about dominance and degradation.
Nathan J. Brown