Commentary
Dmitri Trenin
{
"authors": [
"Dmitri Trenin"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
John Mroz, a Public Diplomat (1948-2014)
John Mroz, who died earlier this month, was the founder of the EastWest Institute, a novel concept of a “think and do tank” which sought to organize Track 2 and Track 1.5 discussions across the Cold War divide. Mroz has departed precisely at the moment when the need for his services has peaked again.
Published on Aug 26, 2014
John Mroz, who died earlier this month, was well known to those Russians who, over the last three decades, participated in public policy exchanges with their American colleagues. Back in 1980 Mroz founded the EastWest Institute, a novel concept of a "think and do tank" which sought to organize Track 2 and Track 1.5 discussions across the Cold War divide.
It would be correct to say that John himself was a global institution. His ebullient energy allowed him to reach the high and mighty around the world and engage them in the cause of greater international security. The issues he took up ranged from Israel-PLO dialogue to Germany's reunification to U.S.-Russian cooperation on ballistic missile defense. Sometimes these engagements produced policy outcomes, sometimes not, but they always left an impact.
As the United States and Russia have just entered a new period of bitter rivalry, serious dialogue between their concerned citizens is as important as it was in 1980, when John Mroz founded his institute. However, ironically, there is less recognition now of the urgency of this task and less willingness to take it up.
Leaving U.S.-Russian relations to occasional phone calls between the Kremlin and the White House and the periodic meetings between the two countries' foreign ministers is not a good option when the media on both sides are becoming increasingly polemical, with many journalists and experts acting as combatants in an information warfare.
A new effort to structure serious discussions between Russians and Americans is sorely needed. Track 2 and Track 1.5 exchanges are indispensable for moving the U.S.-Russian relationship off the dangerous course it has taken. John Mroz has departed precisely at the moment when the need for his services has peaked again. He will be missed.
About the Author
Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
- Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space
- What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West RevealedCommentary
Dmitri Trenin
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center
- Lebanon Should Try to Place Hezbollah on the U.S.-Iran TableCommentary
As talks begin between Washington and Tehran, Beirut has an opening to advance a regional plan for the party’s disarmament.
Michael Young
- Board Up Donald Trump’s Failed Board of PeaceCommentary
What is behind Marco Rubio’s announcement that the body is now an international nongovernmental organization?
Zaha Hassan
- Looking Past the Wall on Palestine-IsraelCommentary
Policy discussion is ignoring that the Palestinian national project is hollowed out and apartheid is a present danger.
Nathan J. Brown
- Israel’s Security Means Insecurity in the Middle EastCommentary
As negotiations with Iran and Lebanon continue, chaos is at the heart of the Netanyahu government’s calculations.
Michael Young
- Pushing Beirut into an Armed Conflict With Hezbollah Is InsaneCommentary
The party’s domestic and regional roles have changed, so Lebanon should devise a disarmament strategy that encompasses this.
Michael Young
