Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.
Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
The Carnegie Endowment announces a Carnegie Paper by visiting scholar Rolf Schuette that argues that relations between the E.U. and Russia cannot develop into a full-fledged "strategic partnership," if they are based only on common interests and not also on common values and mutual trust.
Contact: Carmen MacDougall, 202-939-2319, cmacdougall@CarnegieEndowment.org
For Immediate Release: December 21, 2004
This fall European criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s policies reached a new high, as critics saw the political measures he announced after the Beslan terrorist attack as exploiting the events to further curtail democracy. Doubts about Russia’s commitment to “common European values,” one of the bedrocks of the partnership between the two actors, are gaining momentum. Visiting scholar Rolf Schuette argues that relations between the E.U. and Russia cannot develop into a full-fledged “strategic partnership,” if they are based only on common interests and not also on common values and mutual trust. Read E.U. - Russia Relations: Interests and Values – A European Perspective here.
The Carnegie Paper reviews E.U.-Russia relations from a European perspective, examining how the common values of democracy, human rights, and rule of law have figured in the relationship. The first section analyzes the formulation of E.U. policy towards Russia and then outlines the structure and four main areas of E.U.-Russian cooperation. Schuette points out that the E.U. and Russia have a unique relationship based on years of intensive dialogue and geographical proximity. Natural partners, they complement each other most clearly in the areas of trade, investment and energy. Though recent developments seem discouraging, the E.U. should not give up its efforts to counter troublesome trends that contradict the common values to which Russia previously committed.
Specifically, Schuette suggests that the E.U. send a clear, consistent message in its dialogue with Russia, saying that:
Rolf Schuette was a visiting scholar in the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment during the fall of 2004. He is a career diplomat in the German Foreign Service and was also the head of the Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova division in the Foreign Office in Berlin. The paper expresses his personal opinion and not official position.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.
Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov
With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.
Bashir Kitachaev
If the regime in Tehran survives, it could be obliged to hand Moscow significant political influence in exchange for supplies of weapons and humanitarian aid.
Nikita Smagin
The interventions in Iran and Venezuela are in keeping with Trump’s strategy of containing China, but also strengthen Russia’s position.
Mikhail Korostikov
Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.
Nikita Smagin