Commentary
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Caucasus",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Foreign Policy",
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
Press Release: Russian Elite’s Role in Putin’s Russia
Published on Jun 27, 2006
For Immediate Release: June 27, 2006
Contact: Jennifer Linker, +1 (202) 939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
The latest briefing by Carnegie Moscow Center scholar Lilia Shevtsova, Putin’s Legacy: How the Russian Elite is Coping with Russia’s Challenges, offers keen analysis of how the current governing elite under Vladimir Putin has shaped domestic and foreign politics and the potential consequences of its policies for international relations and for Russian state affairs. She expounds on the conditions needed for modernization in Russia, and delineates how Western counterparts can contribute to achieving the “benevolent transformation of the Russian state.”
Shevtsova posits that Putin’s type of personified power has led to a bureaucratic-authoritarian regime through which the governing elite has emerged, consolidated power and governed. Shevtsova claims that “the bureaucratic corporation has succeeded not only in using the presidency as its instrument, but in presenting its own interests as those of the Russian state.” She believes that the governing elite has taken the country in a worrisome direction which undermines the potential for the future progress of Russia.
This newly emboldened bureaucracy influences the economy in visible ways. According to Shevtsova, redistribution of assets from the oligarchs to the bureaucracy enabled members to also sit on corporate boards thereby giving the bureaucratic corporation greater means of controlling state assets. The expected increase of the bureaucracy’s control of economic assets is sure to jeopardize the economy. Russia’s economy is losing steam; interventionist state policies scare off investors and Russian money is leaving the country.
Shevtsova cautions that the elite is bringing Russia dangerously close to resembling a nuclear-petrostate. Telltale signs include the union of business and government, corruption, large monopolies, and the broad gap between rich and poor. The elite manipulates resource capacity so as to promote Russia as an “energy superpower,” but such reliance also undercuts the prospect of developing a competitive, high-tech market economy.
Direct link to briefing: www.carnegie.ru/en/pubs/briefings/Briefing-2006-04-web_en.pdf
Lilia Shevtsova is one of Russia’s most astute political analysts and a regular commentator on Russian domestic and foreign policies in both Russian and international media. She is a prolific author of books, articles, and opinion pieces, including the highly acclaimed book Putin’s Russia.
Carnegie Moscow Center (CMC) was established in 1993 by Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. CMC conducts a wide range of political and socio-economic research, hosts open forums, and carries out publishing activities. CMC’s mission is to promote intellectual cooperation among researchers and policy experts; to provide independent analysis of public policy issues; and to serve as an independent forum for discussions of the most important questions facing Russia, Eurasia, and international security.
Press Contacts:
Jennifer Linker (Washington)
+1 (202) 939-2372
jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
Natalia Bubnova (Moscow)
+7 (495) 935-8904, ext. 230
Natalia.Bubnova@carnegie.ru
If you have received this message in error, send a message to info@CarnegieEndowment.org
###
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- The Afghanistan–Pakistan War Poses Awkward Questions for Russia
- Moldova Floats a New Approach to Its Transnistria ConundrumCommentary
Moldova’s reintegration plan was drawn up to demonstrate to Brussels that Chișinău is serious about the Transnistria issue—and to get the West to react.
Vladimir Solovyov
- After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?Commentary
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
- Lukashenko’s Bromance With Trump Has a Sell-By DateCommentary
Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.
Artyom Shraibman
- What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle EastCommentary
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
