{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "democracy",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "DCG",
"programs": [
"Democracy, Conflict, and Governance",
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Lebanon",
"Syria",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Democracy",
"Economy",
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
In view of the current conflict between Lebanon and Israel, policy makers should highlight the importance of domestic political reform in the Middle East.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 17, 2006
In view of the current conflict between Lebanon and Israel, policy makers should highlight the importance of domestic political reform in the Middle East. A new paper from the Carnegie Endowment’s Middle East Program, Reform in Syria: Steering between the Chinese Model and Regime Change, explores the external-internal tangle that is Syrian politics—its recent history, efforts at economic and administrative reform, opposition parties and coalitions, and the priorities for and obstacles to meaningful democratic reform. This paper is the latest contribution to the Carnegie Paper series on Arab political reform. Click here to read the paper or here to access the entire series.
The author underscores that while the Syrian regime is not averse to change, it wants reforms to take place in a slow, steady manner, to avoid the loss of political control. Syrian government officials explicitly seek to emulate the Chinese model of reform, which promoted economic reform and modernization in many sectors while the Chinese Communist Party retained complete political control. The Syrians are determined to avoid the experiences of Eastern Europe and the former USSR, where modest political openings quickly mushroomed into regime collapse. The author lays out the priorities for reform, describes the obstacles these reforms face, and explicates Syria’s internal weak and divided opposition.
The paper suggests to policy makers the three most likely political scenarios for Syria’s future: the existing power structure will prevail; an internal coup by the Alawites in the military will occur; or the regime will experience a complete collapse, leading to a difficult period of instability because of the weakness of the Syrian opposition.
The international community is faced with many uncertainties and challenges in Syria and immediate regime change is not likely to bring about positive results. The United States and European countries are more likely to succeed in promoting positive change in the long run if they take the following steps:
Direct link to pdf: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/CEIP_CP_69_final.pdf
The Democracy and Rule of Law Program’s Middle East Series examines the governmental makeup and political reform of various countries in the region. For other papers in the series or to learn more about Carnegie’s Middle East program go to www.CarnegieEndowment.org/MiddleEast.
Contact: Jennifer Linker, (tel) +1 202/939-2372, jlinker@CarnegieEndowment.org
###
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.
Artyom Shraibman
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.
Alexandra Prokopenko
Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.
Serik Beysembaev