• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Albert Keidel"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Why Buy U.S. Debt?

In light of the Obama administration's forecast that the government will borrow $3.7 trillion in the next two years, there are growing concerns over the willingness and ability of global investors to finance American debt.

Link Copied
By Dr. Albert Keidel
Published on Mar 4, 2009

Source: Diane Rehm Show

The Obama administration's recent budget forecast calls for the federal government to borrow $3.7 trillion in the next two years—prompting growing concerns over the willingness and ability of global investors, especially China, to finance the burgeoning debt of the United States.  To discuss those concerns, Albert Keidel joined Robert Hormats, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs, International, and John B. Taylor, professor of economics at Stanford University, on WAMU’s The Diane Rehm Show.  

Keidel noted that several years ago the dollar weakened relative to other currencies because other economies seemed reasonably healthy.  With the  rapid decline in the global economy, investors now recognize that the dollar is the safest currency in uncertain times.  Despite short-term difficulties, he noted, the U.S. economy is still the largest and most sophisticated in the world, and its government has a long track record of responsible financial and fiscal policies to avoid the kind of inflation that damages investor confidence.  Hence, foreign and domestic investors have increased their purchases of U.S. dollar denominated instruments, especially U.S. Treasury bonds.  

History suggests that the only effective time to reduce a country’s debt is during a period of healthy economic growth, as the United States did in the late 1990s.  If, as many experts argue, today's recession is worse than a common “every-ten-year” decline, Keidel explains that reducing budget deficits by constraining spending would be a misplaced priority.  In such circumstances, failure to spend smartly and decisively to turn around the global economy will amount to "inter-generational theft."  Cutting deficits now and failing to achieve a lasting recovery would burden the next generation with years of stagnant growth, unpaid debt, and reduced opportunities.

About the Author

Dr. Albert Keidel

Former Senior Associate, China Program

Keidel served as acting director and deputy director for the Office of East Asian Nations at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Before joining Treasury in 2001, he covered economic trends, system reforms, poverty, and country risk as a senior economist in the World Bank office in Beijing.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    As China's Exports Drop, Can Domestic Demand Drive Growth?

      Dr. Albert Keidel

  • Article
    China’s Fourth Quarter 2008 Statistical Record

      Dr. Albert Keidel

Dr. Albert Keidel
Former Senior Associate, China Program
Albert Keidel
EconomyForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaChina

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

    For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

      Friedrich Conradi

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?

    Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.

      James D.J. Brown

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Coal Industry Is Running on Borrowed Time

    Powerful lobbyists and inertia led to Russia’s coal-mining sector missing an excellent opportunity to solve its structural problems.

      Alexey Gusev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?

    Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle East

    The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.

      Nikita Smagin

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.