• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Sinan Ülgen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Turkey’s Transformation",
    "Brexit and UK Politics"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Europe",
    "Levant"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie Europe

How to Make Up With Ankara

Although France's opposition to Turkish accession creates tension in the two countries' relations, events in the Southern Mediterranean offer a unique opportunity for strategic cooperation between the EU and Turkey.

Link Copied
By Sinan Ülgen
Published on Feb 25, 2011

Source: EurActiv

How to Make Up With AnkaraFrench President Nicolas Sarkozy's visit to Turkey looks to be a difficult one. The relations between Ankara and Paris remain tense because of the dispute between the two countries regarding Turkey's candidacy for membership of the European Union; France in effect arguing that Turkey should not join the Union.

This position – which has been official since Sarkozy became president, as he had made it one of his campaign promises – has led French diplomacy to unilaterally block five chapters of Turkey's accession negotiations. French diplomats and politicians insist that Franco-Turkish relations can be deepened despite this difference of opinion. It is this reasoning that President Sarkozy will have to defend during his visit to Ankara. Given Ankara's feelings on the subject, he will likely need the full extent of his powers of persuasion.

If we only look at the statistics, the foundations of the bilateral relationship remain solid. Some 10,000 Turkish students continue to study the French language in francophone lycées, such as the Galatasaray Lisesi, the 'imperial Ottoman lycée' which since 1868 has trained the elite of the Ottoman Empire. Paris supports these schools in part by providing teachers.

If one adds students in the Cultural Institutes of Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir, there are a total of about 40,000 Turks who want to be able to express themselves in the language of Molière. In addition to the educational aspect, bilateral relations rest on substantial commercial exchanges, reaching approximately €11 billion in 2010.

Some 300 French companies, who employ a total of 70,000 people, are also present in Turkey. France remains one of the principal sources of investment in Turkey with €2 billion of direct investment over the past five years.

Nonetheless, these statistics cannot hide a much less attractive reality. The psychological distance which now marks relations affects the effectiveness of the French presence in Turkey and its ability to influence the evolution of the country.

Indeed, the Turks assert that French leaders are deceiving themselves if they think it is possible to separate the European issue, linked to a project that goes to the very heart of Turkish identity and Turkey's modernisation project, from the purely bilateral aspect of relations that is political, cultural and economic exchange.

The Turks feel the French policy to be a refusal of their identity and of their aspirations. From here comes an obstructionism, which sometimes presents itself in the form of the exclusion of French companies from big projects such as the Nabucco gas pipeline, sometimes through political rivalry which pushes Turkey to directly compete with French influence in the Middle East and North Africa.

It is in this context that the presidential visit will take place. The question is therefore to figure out what message President Sarkozy could send to Turkish leaders and public opinion.

A Unique Opportunity

The events that are shaking the Arab countries of the Mediterranean in fact offer a remarkable opportunity. The desire for a democratic transition shown by these demonstrations is a way to open a new area of cooperation between Ankara, Paris and Brussels: that of strategic cooperation in foreign policy.

Indeed, the current restructuring of the political and social fields in the region will necessitate a reconfiguration of European initiatives with partners on the southern coast of the Mediterranean. The policies undertaken up to now, whether the Barcelona Process or the Union for the Mediterranean, have never been able to break through.

It would be vain to continue the same course of action without taking into consideration the current upheavals. This is an opportunity for the European Union to think about a more appropriate approach, which takes into account the changes that have been set into motion, as well as the multipolarity of influential actors in the region.

Turkey emerges as a critical partner in this effort. In its quest for influence and prestige on the world stage, Ankara should amply benefit from the current events so as to consolidate its presence in the region, as much from the political as the diplomatic point of view. Turkey is perceived to be a potential model for these countries that are apparently in transition; so many assets that the EU should not obstruct.

President Sarkozy should then go to Ankara as a French leader, but also as a member of the European Union. If he really wishes to reinforce the bilateral ties between France and Turkey, he should show an interest in reinforced cooperation between Turkey and the EU in foreign policy.

Such a position, especially coming from Paris, would not only bear witness to the common interest of both parties in working together, but in addition the French leader would recognise that Turkey is an important actor on the world stage.

Without going back on his position for a potential accession, support for such cooperation could make a success of a visit that is otherwise of little interest.

About the Author

Sinan Ülgen

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Sinan Ülgen is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe in Brussels, where his research focuses on Turkish foreign policy, transatlantic relations, international trade, economic security, and digital policy.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    Reforming European Security: A Turkish Perspective
      • +5

      Alper Coşkun, Fatih Ceylan, Tacan İldem, …

  • Paper
    From Trade Dependence to Geopolitical Leverage: The EU in an Era of Weaponized Interdependence

      Sinan Ülgen

Sinan Ülgen
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Sinan Ülgen
Foreign PolicyMiddle EastEuropeLevant

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Deportation of Russian Propagandist Reveals Battle Over Church Influence in the Balkans

    Mikhail Zvinchuk’s detention could have dealt a serious blow to Russia’s propaganda infrastructure in the Balkans. Instead, the incident has made something else eminently clear: Moscow values and protects its propagandists, while Europe still hasn’t figured out what to do with them.

      Ivan Filippov, Ksenia Luchenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Vučić’s Downfall in Serbia Is Fatal to Russia’s Influence in the Balkans

    The new Serbian leadership may have promised to keep on cooperating with Russia, but soon they will have to make a choice between fighting corruption and sealing lucrative deals with Moscow. The two are mutually exclusive, even if the new leaders in Belgrade haven’t yet realized it.

      Maksim Samorukov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Did Serbia Remove Vučić Without a Single Smashed Window?

    Serbia’s electoral earthquake is an extremely rare example of an entire political system being defeated by street protesters who played by the rules.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Has Tokyo’s Response to Kremlin Challenges Been So Muted?

    Japan’s long-term security policy is driven by concerns about China, and there is little appetite for (or interest in) pursuing a confrontation with Moscow.  

      James D.J. Brown

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Future of Russian-European Relations Is Bleak

    The truth of the strategic situation is that Europe and Russia are extremely unlikely to be able to “turn the page” on their confrontation within the next two decades.

      Arkady Moshes

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.