Q&A
Christopher Boucek
{
"authors": [
"Christopher Boucek"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Saudi Arabia",
"Gulf"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
No Tipping Point Yet
While the Arab world continues to see massive upheaval, the Saudi royal family has relied on a new social welfare package, religious persuasion, and not-so-subtle threats of coercion to neutralize opposition and mute demonstrations.
Published on Mar 14, 2011
Source: New York Times
Even though massive demonstrations haven’t roiled Saudi Arabia, activists have been inspired by protesters around the region and are calling for political and social reforms. They want improved civil liberties, less corruption, better financial transparency, and limits on the monarchy’s power. But protesters are not openly calling for the royal family to be overthrown — they are just looking for more responsive government.
The royal family has relied on a new social welfare package, religious persuasion, and not-so-subtle threats of coercion to neutralize opposition and defuse popular unrest. King Abdullah announced a new $36 billion package in February that will provide unemployment assistance, offer more affordable housing for families, and make pay raises for state employees permanent. While this amount was undoubtedly increased with the protests in Tunisia and Egypt in mind, it is still a manageable amount for the government as it only accounts for a little over 8 percent of the country’s foreign currency reserves.
By mobilizing the official clerical establishment, the government is using religious justifications to mute calls for demonstrations. Leading imams and the country’s highest religious body are denouncing protests as un-Islamic. The amount of influence such efforts have is unclear, but they are typical tools for social control in Saudi Arabia. Beyond this, demonstrations are strictly forbidden in the kingdom and the government isn’t wasting any opportunity to reemphasize the illegality.
The government will likely announce a cabinet reshuffle soon, which will present an opportunity to introduce some new blood into an aging government. The Saudi government will have to introduce political reforms, but change will not come quickly to the kingdom. For Riyadh the challenge will be to manage the process of introducing changes without exacerbating societal tensions. While economic improvements may temporarily hold off calls for political reform, they cannot replace them indefinitely.
About the Author
Christopher Boucek
Former Associate, Middle East Program
Boucek was an associate in the Carnegie Middle East Program where his research focused on security challenges in the Arabian Peninsula and Northern Africa.
- Yemen After Saleh’s Return and Awlaki’s Exit
- Rivals—Iran vs. Saudi ArabiaQ&A
Christopher Boucek, Karim Sadjadpour
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- The Rada Reawakens: Ukraine’s Messy Politics ReturnsCommentary
The return of parliamentary politics reflects a broader shift from earlier expectations of a settlement and elections toward the reality of a prolonged war.
Balázs Jarábik
- Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?Commentary
The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.
Maria Kolomychenko
- Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?Commentary
After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?Commentary
It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.
Mikayel Zolyan
- The Afghanistan–Pakistan War Poses Awkward Questions for RussiaCommentary
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
