China's Conflict Between Economic and Political Liberalization

{
  "authors": [
    "Yukon Huang"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Other

China's Conflict Between Economic and Political Liberalization

By Yukon Huang

Published on Dec 31, 2012

Source: SAIS Review

China’s impressive growth record has been facilitated by a unique relationship between Beijing and the provinces that encourages experimentation and incentivizes officials for driving economic growth—and for the most part this helped maintain political stability. While these arrangements spurred economic liberalization, political liberalization was put on hold. But rapid growth has not spared China from increasing social unrest given frustrations over widening disparities both in opportunities and outcomes and mounting conflicts over use of resources. Some now question the regime’s capacity to deal with society’s concerns. This paper examines recent politically charged events that have intensified discussions about the potential for economic and political reforms that would be acceptable to the Communist Party and still supportive of China’s broader objectives.

Three decades of economic liberalization have restored much of the vibrancy that China last displayed two centuries ago when it accounted for a significant share of the world’s economy. Yet its political system seems to have been caught in a time warp. Ever since the Arab Spring began dominating headlines, there has been renewed speculation that social unrest could foment a similar cascade of change in China. Even Premier Wen Jiabao concluded at last March’s National People’s Congress that dealing with pressures for political reform will be a high priority for the future leadership. But the Bo Xilai affair significantly escalated what is at stake by casting the issue as a conflict between reformers and those wedded to the past. This is now seen as influencing the transition to China’s next generation of senior leaders.

Discussions about China’s political evolution are normally grounded in debates over democratization, military security, and human rights. More attention, however, needs to be given to whether the nature of China’s economic transformation, supported by its unique form of regional decentralization, has contributed to a stalemate regarding political liberalization.

Read the full paper in the SAIS Review.

About the Author

Yukon Huang

Senior Fellow, Asia Program

Huang is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program where his research focuses on China’s economy and its regional and global impact.

Recent Work

Commentary
Three Takeaways From the Biden-Xi Meeting
- Yukon Huang, Isaac B. Kardon, Matt Sheehan
Commentary
Europe Narrowly Navigates De-risking Between Washington and Beijing
- Yukon Huang, Genevieve Slosberg

Political Reform Economy East Asia China

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Rada Reawakens: Ukraine’s Messy Politics Returns
The return of parliamentary politics reflects a broader shift from earlier expectations of a settlement and elections toward the reality of a prolonged war.
Balázs Jarábik
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?
Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.
James D.J. Brown
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?
The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.
Maria Kolomychenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Russia’s Coal Industry Is Running on Borrowed Time
Powerful lobbyists and inertia led to Russia’s coal-mining sector missing an excellent opportunity to solve its structural problems.
Alexey Gusev

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

Friedrich Conradi

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Rada Reawakens: Ukraine’s Messy Politics Returns

The return of parliamentary politics reflects a broader shift from earlier expectations of a settlement and elections toward the reality of a prolonged war.

Balázs Jarábik

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?

Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.