• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy",
    "Global Governance"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Being In Charge Ain’t What It Used to Be

Although the change in power dynamics has led to increased competition and advanced opportunities for voters, citizens, workers, and entrepreneurs, it is also tied to the political gridlock taking place around the world.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Mar 28, 2013

Source: Yahoo's Daily Ticker

Speaking on Yahoo's Daily Ticker, Carnegie's Moisés Naím discussed the fleeting nature of power. Chief executives in 30 of 34 democracies are dealing with a parliament controlled by the opposition, as landslide victories are becoming "endangered species." Political gridlock has been observed at home in Washington, D.C. with the sequester, as well as abroad with the outcome of the Italian elections. The trend is evidenced in corporations as well, asserted Naím. Although the financial sector continues to be powerful, the use and the capacity of their power are constrained.

Although this change in power dynamics seems beneficial and a shift to celebrate, there are risks, Naím continued. Aside from the increased competition, more intense scrutiny, and advanced opportunities for voters, citizens, workers, and entrepreneurs, the downside is manifesting in the gridlock observed in politics. Gridlock is creating weaker democracies with governments incapable of delivering timely decisions effectively. This is in turn making decisions on a global level more difficult. Furthermore, the capacity for countries to work collaboratively to tackle issues is declining, explained Naím.

It would be too simple to say the Internet, media, and other IT revolutionary technologies are the driving forces, Naím added. These are simply tools that are being used by users. But these users are being driven, directed, and motivated by tertiary factors. These tectonic changes, as Naím described them, include changes in demographics as well as the international distribution of assets and activities. The forces behind the shift in power can be categorized as either the More revolution, the Mobility revolution, and the Mentality revolution.

This interview was originally broadcast on Yahoo's Daily Ticker.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
Political ReformEconomyGlobal GovernanceNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?

    Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.   

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus Realignment

    With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced Voting

    The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.

      Andrey Pertsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Can the Disparate Threads of Ukraine Peace Talks Be Woven Together?

    Putin is stalling, waiting for a breakthrough on the front lines or a grand bargain in which Trump will give him something more than Ukraine in exchange for concessions on Ukraine. And if that doesn’t happen, the conflict could be expanded beyond Ukraine.

      Alexander Baunov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?

    As discussions about settlement and elections move from speculation to preparation, Kyiv will have to manage not only the battlefield, but also the terms of political transition. The thaw will not resolve underlying tensions; it will only expose them more clearly.

      Balázs Jarábik

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.