Commentary
Nathan J. Brown
{
"authors": [
"Nathan J. Brown"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Egypt: An Islamist Movement In Crisis
The real question facing Egypt has to do with the role of Islam in public life and who speaks for Islam in public life, which is ultimately more of a political conflict than a religious one.
Published on Aug 22, 2013
Source: NPR Kojo Nnamdi Show
Speaking on NPR’s Kojo Nnamdi Show, Carnegie’s Nathan Brown explained that the release of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak on August 22nd was a political rather than legal move, because the political context in Egypt today is very different from when Mubarak was arrested. But while many Egyptians have moved on, “the core constituency from the Egyptian revolution back in 2011, however, is likely to see this as a betrayal and a reversal,” Brown warned.
Brown noted that Egypt is in the middle of a very different set of political conflicts, in an atmosphere of both political and social repression. “The real question has to do with the role of Islam in public life and, especially, who speaks for Islam in public life,” Mr. Brown said. “That’s what the conflict is and that’s really, I think, more of a political conflict than a religious one.”The current crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood is a departure from the cat and mouse game of the Mubarak era, Brown argued, when the conflict was between a regime that wanted to retain control and a Brotherhood trying to find ways to continue operating. He said it was a return back to the 1940s and 1950s when there were attempts to shut down the organization as a whole.
In the years since the Egyptian revolution, the Brotherhood managed to establish itself as a normal political actor in Egyptian politics, Brown concluded. But while the West came to accept the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise to power, some states in the region viewed it as a real threat.
This interview was originally aired on NPR’s Kojo Nnamdi Show.
About the Author
Nathan J. Brown
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, is a distinguished scholar and author of nine books on Arab politics and governance, as well as editor of five books.
- Trump’s Plan for Gaza Is Not Irrelevant. It’s Worse.
- Israel’s Forever WarsCommentary
Nathan J. Brown
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle EastCommentary
The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
- Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?Commentary
It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.
Mikayel Zolyan
- The Afghanistan–Pakistan War Poses Awkward Questions for RussiaCommentary
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
- After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?Commentary
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
- Tokayev’s New Constitution Is a Bet on Stability—At Freedom’s ExpenseCommentary
Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.
Serik Beysembaev
