Q&A
Aaron David Miller, Karim Sadjadpour, Robin Wright
{
"authors": [
"Karim Sadjadpour"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Iranian Proliferation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Obama’s Letters to Iran About Nuclear Arms
Given everything that’s taking place in the Middle East, Iran may be one of the few sources of hope for the Obama administration to reach some kind of diplomatic accommodation.
Published on Sep 18, 2013
Source: MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports
In an exchange of letters with Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani, U.S. President Obama said that the United States is ready to resolve the nuclear arms dispute with Iran. Speaking on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports, Carnegie’s Karim Sadjapour discussed whether the letters signal a shift in communication between the United States and Iran. Sadjapour noted that, given everything that’s taking place in the Middle East, Iran is one of the few sources of hope for the Obama administration to reach some kind of diplomatic accommodation. However, with Iran militarily propping up the Assad regime in Syria, Sadjapour argued that there are certain strategic principles within the Iranian regime which will be very difficult for anyone to change, including President Rouhani.
Sadjapour said the question is whether or not the United States and Iran can overcome their differences on Syria and Israel in order to reach a nuclear détente. “I would say between President Obama in Washington and President Rouhani in Tehran, this is the best opportunity we’ve had for a diplomatic breakthrough at least for 15 years,” Sadjapour concluded.
This interview was originally broadcast on MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell Reports.
About the Author
Karim Sadjadpour
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.
- What’s Keeping the Iranian Regime in Power—for Now
- How Washington and Tehran Are Assessing Their Next StepsQ&A
Aaron David Miller, David Petraeus, Karim Sadjadpour
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- How Far Can Russian Arms Help Iran?Commentary
Arms supplies from Russia to Iran will not only continue, but could grow significantly if Russia gets the opportunity.
Nikita Smagin
- Can the Disparate Threads of Ukraine Peace Talks Be Woven Together?Commentary
Putin is stalling, waiting for a breakthrough on the front lines or a grand bargain in which Trump will give him something more than Ukraine in exchange for concessions on Ukraine. And if that doesn’t happen, the conflict could be expanded beyond Ukraine.
Alexander Baunov
- Once Neutral on the Ukraine War, Arab States Increasingly Favor MoscowCommentary
Disillusioned with the West over Gaza, Arab countries are not only trading more with Russia; they are also more willing to criticize Kyiv.
Ruslan Suleymanov
- Signs of an Imminent End to the Ukraine War Are DeceptiveCommentary
The main source of Russian aggression is a profound mistrust of the West and the firm belief that it intends to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia. As long as this fear persists, the war will not end.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- For Putin, Increasing Russia’s Nuclear Threat Matters More Than the Triad’s ModernizationCommentary
For Putin, upgrading Russia’s nuclear forces was a secondary goal. The main aim was to gain an advantage over the West, including by strengthening the nuclear threat on all fronts. That made growth in missile arsenals and a new arms race inevitable.
Maxim Starchak
