In The Media
Lilia Shevtsova
{
"authors": [
"Lilia Shevtsova"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Eastern Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Democracy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
A Great Man Died
Tadeusz Mazowiecki, who was the first Polish non-communist prime minister, died on October 28. He will be remembered as a Man Who Helped to Open a New Era—and not only for Poland.
Published on Oct 29, 2013
Tadeusz Mazowiecki, the prime minister of Poland from 1989 till 1991 and the first non-communist prime minister in Central and Eastern Europe in the post-WWII period, died on October 28. He belonged to the same brilliant generation of courageous individuals always ready for sacrifice, also represented by Vaclav Havel and another Pole, Bronislaw Geremek.
Mazowiecki was one of the founders of the Catholic Intelligentsia Club and the highest moral authority for the Polish political and intellectual circles. After the martial law was declared in Poland in 1981, he was arrested and imprisoned by the Communist authorities. Yet he never tried to take revenge. He always believed that the power was to be taken from the Communist Party through negotiation. He became one of the key participants of the Polish Round Table Talks in 1988 that brought the landslide Solidarity victory on June 4, 1989. In August 1989, the Polish Sejm elected him prime minister, and his government carried out fundamental reforms, returning Poland to Europe.
I am proud that I knew Pan Tadeusz when he was the editor-in-chief of the Tygodnik Solidarnosc. He helped me a lot with his advice and with his ideas when I worked on my book on the Polish Catholic Church…
Now he is gone. But he will be remembered as a Man Who Helped to Open a New Era—and not only for Poland!
About the Author
Lilia Shevtsova
Former Senior Associate, Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program, Moscow Center
Shevtsova chaired the Russian Domestic Politics and Political Institutions Program at the Carnegie Moscow Center, dividing her time between Carnegie’s offices in Washington, DC, and Moscow. She had been with Carnegie since 1995.
- Putin Has Fought His Way Into a Corner
- How Long Russians Will Believe in Fairy Tale?Commentary
Lilia Shevtsova
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Turkmenistan’s Ruling Duo Is Having a Family Feud. Will Their Regime Survive It?Commentary
Ex-president Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov remains interested in politics, but his son Serdar, Turkmenistan’s current president, is becoming increasingly independent and willing to break with his father’s legacy. If their covert rivalry goes too far, both risk losing power.
Galiya Ibragimova
- How the Kremlin Achieved Its Latest Implausible Election ResultsCommentary
Sergei Kiriyenko used Russia’s parliamentary vote to further hone his strategy of corporate mobilization that is designed to maximize votes for United Russia.
Andrey Pertsev
- Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?Commentary
The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.
Dimitar Bechev
- Leaving Russian-Speakers Without Representation Is a Risk for LatviaCommentary
If the Russian-speaking community in Latvia cannot articulate their interests without being seen as disloyal, they could end up embracing a pro-Kremlin agenda.
Sergejs Potapkins
- Putin Has Been a Hindrance, Not a Help, to United Russia’s Election CampaignCommentary
Russia’s ruling party would have benefited from Putin appearing as its distant patron, but as an active frontman imposing his views on the public, he has done nothing but harm both the party’s election campaign and the ruling system overall.
Andrey Pertsev
