Article
Paul Stronski
{
"authors": [
"Paul Stronski"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Central Asia",
"Kazakhstan"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Kazakhstan: Are Land Protests the Start of a Larger Wave of Discontent?
Recent protests against land reforms in Kazakhstan raise questions about whether the system that President Nazarbayev built can meet the country’s current challenges.
Published on Jun 7, 2016
Source: Polish Institute of International Affairs
Kazakhstan’s governing model has been showing signs of strain in recent years, but these protests raise questions about whether the system that President Nazarbayev built can meet the country’s current challenges. The protests started over opposition to land reform proposals, but they now reflect growing anger at popular exclusion from governance, elite entitlement and pervasive corruption. This backlash is similar to protest sentiment elsewhere in Europe, Eurasia and North America where people increasingly feel that their countries’ long-standing political and economic systems are corrupt and benefit only the wealthy. In Kazakhstan, however, the fragility of the political system, protracted economic decline, and the lack of formal mechanisms for the population to influence public policy exacerbate the situation.
Why now? Kazakhstan’s economy is contracting due to low energy prices and several external factors, including the slowdown in the Russian and Chinese economies and disarray in the European Union. Foreign Direct Investment has declined steeply and the currency devaluation halved many Kazakhs’ purchasing power. This economic malaise undermines the social contract in which Kazakhs were promised improved living standards in exchange for an extremely limited say in how they were governed. The state now has difficulty holding up its end of the bargain.
The government’s tight control over media exacerbated the protests, which were fueled by rumors and alarmist social media reports that Astana was preparing to sell land to wealthy Chinese investors. Popular outrage over this prospect is worrying evidence that xenophobia and nationalism are on the rise. Astana has since scrapped the reforms and established a new land commission, while the police have largely refrained from using violence. Yet these positive steps are undermined by the continued detention of some activists, while the government’s ham-fisted efforts to discredit the protestors damage its own credibility. Dissent most likely will continue, although the exact form it will take is not yet clear.
This article originally appeared in the Polish Institute of International Affairs.
About the Author
Paul Stronski
Former Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
Paul Stronski was a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program, where his research focuses on the relationship between Russia and neighboring countries in Central Asia and the South Caucasus.
- Russia’s Growing Footprint in Africa’s Sahel Region
- Russia in the Balkans After Ukraine: A Troubling ActorCommentary
Paul Stronski
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
- Russia’s Coal Industry Is Running on Borrowed TimeCommentary
Powerful lobbyists and inertia led to Russia’s coal-mining sector missing an excellent opportunity to solve its structural problems.
Alexey Gusev
- Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?Commentary
After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive.
Tatiana Stanovaya
- Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?Commentary
It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.
Mikayel Zolyan
- Power, Pathways, and Policy: Grounding Central Asia’s Digital AmbitionsCommentary
Central Asia’s digital ambitions are achievable, but only if policy is aligned with the region’s physical constraints.
Aruzhan Meirkhanova
- After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?Commentary
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
