• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Maxwell J. Hamilton"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "americanStatecraft",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "ASP",
  "programs": [
    "American Statecraft"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Restoring American Diplomacy Starts With Leadership at Home

According to dozens of career diplomats, restoring U.S. leadership abroad requires addressing the social and economic problems facing Americans at home, including wage stagnation, rising inequality, and drug addiction.

Link Copied
By Maxwell J. Hamilton
Published on Apr 19, 2018

Source: Hill

This month marks the 70th anniversary of the Marshall Plan. The creation of an enlightened and visionary State Department, the Marshall Plan rebuilt war-torn Europe, resuscitated markets for U.S. exports, and thwarted Communist expansion, at the cost of $135 billion in today's dollars.

At a moment when diplomacy has been devalued and leadership of the State Department is in flux, I asked dozens of distinguished diplomats how they would renew American diplomacy in the 21st century. This group included 12 career ambassadors, the highest diplomatic rank, equivalent to a four-star general.

Our career diplomats described a competitive international system characterized by resurgent great power rivalry, rogue states, and persistent terrorist threats. But in their view, the most serious challenge to the U.S.-led international order was not foreign, but domestic.

Restoring U.S. leadership abroad, they insisted, required addressing the social and economic problems facing Americans at home, including wage stagnation, rising inequality, and drug addiction. They identified dozens of ways diplomacy could deliver tangible benefits to the American people. Here are five of their suggestions for the next secretary of State.

Make American foreign policy local

The State Department should deepen relationships with U.S. cities and states increasingly active in foreign policy. Diplomats embedded at the state level can link governors and economic agencies to federal efforts to promote exports and attract foreign investment. The State Department should augment community-level speaking programs – with rotary clubs and faith-based groups – to discuss the local impact of foreign policy. U.S. ambassadors overseas should reach back to congressional districts to explain how their diplomacy and commercial advocacy abroad promotes prosperity for constituents at home.

Promote a free Indo-Pacific region

Last week, President Trump ordered his staff to explore re-joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), an agreement that would generate $131 billion in U.S. exports. Every single career diplomat said TPP was in our strategic and economic interest, but even if the Trump administration does not rejoin, the United States should not allow China to create an exclusive economic sphere in the world’s most dynamic region. Building off Secretary Tillerson’s call for a “free and open Indo-Pacific,” the United States should help countries understand the consequences of China’s assistance, including potential threats to their sovereignty, deepen cooperation with Japan, Australia, and India, and strengthen regional institutions to promote rule of law, freedom of navigation, and free trade.

Create a transatlantic marketplace

Free trade negotiations between the United States and the European Union have stalled as citizens on both sides of the Atlantic question the benefits of economic openness. To inject positive momentum into the transatlantic relationship, the United States should shift from comprehensive trade negotiations to discrete agreements to promote workforce development and support small and medium enterprises. Developed in a paper by Johns Hopkins Professor Daniel Hamilton, the transatlantic marketplace would set an ambitious goal of creating five million jobs by 2025.

Write the rules for a digital economy

In the coming decades, the prosperity of American companies and workers will depend on data – rather than physical goods – crossing international borders. This transformation will not only affect tech companies, but every business online. Two-thirds of new American jobs now require high or medium-level digital skills. As a driver and beneficiary of the digital economy, the United States should lead international efforts to establish rules, standards, and mechanisms to govern data protection and mobility.

Lead a global initiative to end opioid crisis

The opioid crisis involves a complex chain of producer, transit, and consumer countries. Fentanyl, the most dangerous drug in the United States, is produced legally in China, shipped to Mexico, and enters the U.S. supply chain through Mexican heroin and cocaine traffickers. The next Secretary of State should lead and expand the State Department effort to organize affected countries to promote common controls for legal pharmaceutical industries that produce these drugs, stronger trade regulations, and information sharing between U.S. and foreign law enforcement.

None of these initiatives are as sweeping or ambitious as the Marshall Plan, which was born at the apex of U.S. military and economic strength. But as the global distribution of power has flattened, imaginative diplomacy has become more critical, if more difficult, as the United States confronts rising competitors abroad and economic dislocation at home.

Seventy years ago, Secretary Marshall aligned an extraordinary constellation of State Department officials to conceive and implement a plan to halt the spread of Communism and prevent U.S. economic collapse by ensuring Europe had dollars to buy American goods.

Today, the State Department remains filled with creative and energetic diplomats eager to help the next Secretary of State shape a turbulent world. Under inspired leadership, an empowered State Department can reinvigorate American diplomacy and reconnect U.S. foreign policy to the citizens it is supposed to serve.

This article was originally published in the Hill.

About the Author

Maxwell J. Hamilton

Former Visiting Scholar, Geoeconomics and Strategy Program

Maxwell J. Hamilton was a visiting scholar in the Geoeconomics and Strategy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Maxwell J. Hamilton
Former Visiting Scholar, Geoeconomics and Strategy Program
Political ReformForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

    The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?

    After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive. 

      Tatiana Stanovaya

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?

    Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.

      • Sergey Vakulenko

      Sergey Vakulenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle East

    The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Frustration With Armenia’s Pashinyan Enough to Bring the Pro-Russia Opposition to Power?

    It’s true that many Armenians would vote for anyone just to be rid of Pashinyan, whom they blame for the loss of Nagorno-Karabakh, but the pro-Russia opposition is unlikely to be able to channel that frustration into an electoral victory.

      Mikayel Zolyan

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.