• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Charlotte Stanton"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "TIA",
  "programs": [
    "Technology and International Affairs"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Joining the Partnership on AI

The rapid advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) offer extraordinary opportunities and risks.

Link Copied
By Charlotte Stanton
Published on May 15, 2019

The rapid advances in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) offer extraordinary opportunities and risks. The opportunities span almost every societal domain -- from improving the accuracy and speed of medical diagnoses to reducing the energy consumption of data centers. But the risks are equally ubiquitous and significant. AI accidents, AI-enabled synthetic media (e.g., deepfakes), mass unemployment, and algorithmic bias are just some examples of how AI, if hastily developed or deployed, could undermine long-standing social, economic, and political institutions.

Consider AI safety—the collection of research and regulatory efforts seeking to ensure that AI systems reliably perform as desired. Cooperation between technical experts, civil society, and governments is essential for creating the kinds of technical standards and governance mechanisms needed to reduce the risk of AI accidents, particularly as AI is increasingly integrated into critical military and energy systems. The Partnership on AI leverages a powerful community of technical experts and civil society organizations working on AI safety to which Carnegie brings experience navigating the intergovernmental landscape.

Another arena where multi-stakeholder partnerships are essential is synthetic media—images, audio, or video created with AI. Synthetic media has several beneficial applications. For instance, it can recreate the voices of people with ALS who have lost their ability to speak. But synthetic media can also cause harm, for example if a seemingly-realistic false depiction of a political leader doing something she or he didn’t do incites civil unrest. Perhaps more worrisome, a proliferation of synthetic media could increase public skepticism of authentic media, leading to what some have called a ‘post-truth’ society. Maintaining the public’s trust in authentic media against threats from AI-enabled forgeries requires cooperation between journalists, civil society organizations, and social media platforms which the Partnership on AI is forging.

Across these and other areas, we look forward to working with the Partnership’s diverse community of experts to help build the policy infrastructure required for AI’s safe and beneficial use.

About the Author

Charlotte Stanton

Former Director, Silicon Valley Office

Charlotte Stanton was the inaugural director of the Silicon Valley office of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace as well as a fellow in Carnegie’s Technology and International Affairs Program.

    Recent Work

  • Q&A
    The World Isn’t Ready for AI to Upend the Global Economy

      Steven Weber, Charlotte Stanton

  • Article
    What the Machine Learning Value Chain Means for Geopolitics
      • +3

      Charlotte Stanton, Vivien Lung, Nancy (Hanzhuo) Zhang, …

Charlotte Stanton
Former Director, Silicon Valley Office
TechnologyIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Is Belarus’s Approach to Online Censorship So Different From Russia’s?

    For Lukashenko, abandoning Western internet services and embracing Russian equivalents would mean tying himself even closer to Moscow.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

    The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle East

    The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is There a Place for Russia in the New Race Back to the Moon?

    Despite having the resources and expertise, the Russian space industry missed the opportunity to offer the United States or China a mutually rewarding partnership in the lunar race.

      Georgy Trishkin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Power, Pathways, and Policy: Grounding Central Asia’s Digital Ambitions

    Central Asia’s digital ambitions are achievable, but only if policy is aligned with the region’s physical constraints.

      Aruzhan Meirkhanova

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.