• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Ngeow Chow Bing"
  ],
  "type": "scholarSpotlight",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

Scholar Spotlight
Carnegie China

New Scholar Spotlight: Ngeow Chow Bing

Link Copied
By Ngeow Chow Bing
Published on May 15, 2023

China is the largest and most consequential neighboring great power to Southeast Asian countries. Many in the region believe that the economic future of Southeast Asia will depend largely on China’s own economic trajectory. China’s progress in science and technology has made a huge impression, and the products of China’s enterprises are ubiquitous in Southeast Asian markets. China’s universities have become increasingly popular destinations for aspiring Southeast Asian students, supplanting those in the West. China is an active dialogue partner to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), with many areas of economic and functional cooperation benefitting both parties.

Nevertheless, China’s involvement in the intractable South China Sea dispute and its divergent view of international maritime law presents significant security challenges and risks, especially to the Southeast Asian littoral countries involved in the dispute. Under the present leadership of Xi Jinping, China has stepped up asserting its claims in the South China Sea, which have created enormous geopolitical tensions and pressures in the region, with many ramifications for the ongoing U.S.-China rivalry in the Indo-Pacific.

I have worked on various aspects of China-Southeast Asia relations—in particular China-Malaysia relations—in my academic career, from the strategic and security aspects to the softer dimensions of people-to-people exchanges, education, and soft power. It is fascinating to observe the paradoxes, ambiguities, uncertainties, and even contradictions in how countries in the region, either collectively or individually, engage with China and vice versa. China is often understood and perceived in a multifaceted way, generating both excitement and anxiety.

Often, the perspectives and views on China in the Southeast Asian region are not entirely captured or appreciated by the China expert communities in the West. One of my continuous interests has been to analyze how China knowledge capacity and “China studies” communities are formed, built, and connected, especially in the academia of Southeast Asian countries. 

At Carnegie China, my research will investigate two related topics concerning regional geopolitical dynamics. First, I will examine how ASEAN can play a role in moderating U.S.-China competition. ASEAN is the crucial multilateral institution in the region, and over the decades, it has developed an inclusive regional architecture focused on engaging all relevant stakeholders. It has been able to bring together Japan, South Korea, and China in the ASEAN Plus Three framework and remains an important buffer between the United States and China. My research will investigate in what ways ASEAN could be more proactively involved in stabilizing the U.S.-China rivalry, including initiating a platform or framework of ASEAN Plus Two (China and the United States).

Second, I will research developments of China’s defense diplomacy in the region—with a particular focus on Malaysia—from the angle of military education soft power. China’s military academies of institutions of higher education have received a growing number of foreign military participants, including those from Southeast Asia. How would China’s strategic and/or tactical perspectives and doctrines be received and perceived by these participants? What implications does this form of military soft power have? I intend to explore these under-researched questions at Carnegie China.

I am excited that Carnegie China has displayed a strong interest in building its China-related work from the vantage point of Southeast Asia. This is a promising and unique region from which to observe contemporary developments concerning China’s politics, economy, society, and foreign policy. I am honored to be joining many excellent scholars and colleagues connected with Carnegie, from within and outside this region, in advancing a better understanding of China.

Ngeow Chow Bing
Nonresident Scholar, Carnegie China
Ngeow Chow Bing

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Japan’s “Militarist Turn” and What It Means for Russia

    For a real example of political forces engaged in the militarization of society, the Russian leadership might consider looking closer to home.

      James D.J. Brown

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Is Ukraine Extending a Hand to the Belarusian Opposition-in-Exile?

    The risk posed by Lukashenko today looks very different to how it did in 2022. The threat of the Belarusian army entering the war appears increasingly illusory, while Ukraine’s ability to attack any point in Belarus with drones gives Kyiv confidence.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia Won’t Give Up Its Influence in Armenia Without a Fight

    Instead of a guaranteed ally, the Kremlin now perceives Armenia as yet another hybrid battlefield where it is fighting the West.

      Mikayel Zolyan

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    A New World Police: How Chinese Security Became a Global Export

    China has found a unique niche for itself within the global security ecosystem, eschewing military alliances to instead bolster countries’ internal stability using law enforcement. Authoritarian regimes from the Central African Republic to Uzbekistan are signing up.

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Lithuania’s Potash Dilemma Raises Questions About Sanctions’ Effectiveness

    What should happen when sanctions designed to weaken the Belarusian regime end up enriching and strengthening the Kremlin?  

      Denis Kishinevsky

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.