• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
REQUIRED IMAGE

REQUIRED IMAGE

Article

Talks With North Korea

The announcement that the United States, North Korea and China will hold talks next week in Beijing over North Korea's nuclear program is a welcome development and an apparent victory for the Bush administration's decision to oppose direct, one-on-one talks with Pyongyang.

Link Copied
By Jon Wolfsthal
Published on Apr 16, 2003

The announcement that the United States, North Korea and China will hold talks next week in Beijing over North Korea's nuclear program is a welcome development and an apparent victory for the Bush administration's decision to oppose direct, one-on-one talks with Pyongyang. It remains to be seen, however, if the positions of the United States and North Korea can be brought together to address the severe security concerns raised by Pyongyang's active nuclear weapons program.

Since North Korea expelled International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors in December 2002, it has announced its withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, restarted a plutonium production reactor, continued its development of a uranium enrichment capability and could be only months or weeks away from extracting weapons plutonium for its stock of 8,000 spent fuel rods. North Korea maintains that its withdrawal from the NPT became effective on April 10th, but some countries, including Japan, claim that they have not been directly notified by North Korea as required by Article X of the NPT and, therefore, North Korea's withdrawal is not yet in effect.

The United States maintains that it is prepared to launch a bold initiative toward North Korea but that it cannot do so while North Korea maintains an active nuclear program. Washington has publicly stated that North Korea must dismantle its uranium enrichment effort before broader talks can begin, lest such efforts be seen as rewarding bad behavior by North Korea. US goals of the talks next week are likely to center on steps North Korea must take to freeze and begin eliminating its nuclear program. While the North Korean position is not fully known, it is likely that North Korea will resist eliminating its nuclear program unless it can obtain concrete incentives and commitments from the United States on a host of issues, including a pact of non-aggression, lifting of sanctions, diplomatic recognition and economic assistance.

China's role could be critical in convincing North Korea to curtail its nuclear activities but could also constrain some U.S. efforts to pressure North Korea into compliance with its non-proliferation obligations. The absence of key U.S. allies South Korea and Japan, which both have direct security interests at stake in North Korea, is also likely to require delicate handling by the Bush administration as the tripartite talks move forward.

About the Author

Jon Wolfsthal

Former Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program

Jon Wolfsthal was a nonresident scholar with the Nuclear Policy Program.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Universal Compliance: A Strategy for Nuclear Security<br>With 2007 Report Card on Progress
      • +2

      George Perkovich, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Joseph Cirincione, …

  • Article
    10 Plus 10 Doesn’t Add Up

      Jon Wolfsthal

Jon Wolfsthal
Former Nonresident Scholar, Nuclear Policy Program
Jon Wolfsthal
North AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaNorth KoreaMilitaryForeign PolicyNuclear Policy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Has Kazakhstan Started Deporting Political Activists?

    The current U.S. indifference to human rights means Astana no longer has any incentive to refuse extradition requests from its authoritarian neighbors—including Russia.

      Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?

    Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.   

      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus Realignment

    With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does War in the Middle East Mean for Russia–Iran Ties?

    If the regime in Tehran survives, it could be obliged to hand Moscow significant political influence in exchange for supplies of weapons and humanitarian aid.

      Nikita Smagin

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    How Trump’s Wars Are Boosting Russian Oil Exports

    The interventions in Iran and Venezuela are in keeping with Trump’s strategy of containing China, but also strengthen Russia’s position.

      • Mikhail Korostikov

      Mikhail Korostikov

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.