The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
Source: Getty
The February IAEA safeguards report on Iran indicates that the answers provided by Iran on all but two issues are "consistent" or "not inconsistent" with its information and on schedule with the agreed-upon work plan. However, the final outstanding issues are those most closely associated with weaponization.

The February IAEA safeguards report on Iran (GOV/2008/4) indicates that the answers provided by Iran on all but two issues are "consistent" or "not inconsistent" with its information and on schedule (if not earlier) with the agreed-upon work plan. However, the final outstanding issues are those most closely associated with weaponization. An illustration of Iran’s progress shows that questions regarding its alleged weaponization studies and uranium metal will likely remain contested issues into April 2008 and beyond. (See below for a side-by-side comparison of INFCIRC/711 and GOV/2008/4.)
Comparing Iran’s Nuclear Compliance: INFCIRC/711 and GOV/2008/4
How close is Iran in complying with the Iran-IAEA work plan?
|
|
IAEA PROVIDES QUESTIONS |
MEETING IN IRAN TO DISCUSS |
CLOSURE | |||
|
INFCIRC/711//GOV/2008/4 |
INFCIRC/711 |
GOV/2008/4 |
INFCIRC/711 |
GOV/2008/4 | ||
|
Plutonium |
July 23 |
July |
July |
August 20 |
August 20 | |
|
P1/P2 |
August 31 |
September |
September 24 |
November |
November | |
|
HEU Contamination |
September 15 |
2 weeks after P1/P2 closure (mid-November) |
December 10-12 |
January |
January 8 | |
|
Uranium Metal |
INFCIRC/711: Iran agrees to facilitate comparison of sections of uranium metal document after which IAEA will close issue. | |||||
|
Po-210 |
September 15 after all other questions closed. |
2 weeks after HEU Contamination/ |
January |
March* |
February 22 | |
|
Ghachine Mine |
September 15 |
2 weeks after Po-210 closure (February 22) |
January |
April* |
February 22 | |
|
Alleged Studies |
INFCIRC/711: Iran finds allegations as “baseless” and “political motivated” but will review IAEA-provided documents. | |||||
*These dates were Carnegie estimates for possible issue closure, based on the text of INFCIRC/711. The IAEA indicated in GOV/2008/4 that it no longer considered the Po-210 and Ghachine mine issues to be outstanding.
Click here to download the PDF version of the above table.
Former Senior Associate, Nuclear Policy Program
Squassoni came to Carnegie from the Congressional Research Service. She also served for nine years in the executive branch. Her last position at the State Department was director of Policy Coordination in the Nonproliferation Bureau.
Nima Gerami
Former Research Assistant, Nuclear Policy Program
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
Not only does the fighting jeopardize regional security, it undermines Russian attempts to promote alternatives to the Western-dominated world order.
Ruslan Suleymanov
Lukashenko is willing to make big sacrifices for an invitation to Mar-a-Lago or the White House. He also knows that the clock is ticking: he must squeeze as much out of the Trump administration as he can before congressional elections in November leave Trump hamstrung or distracted.
Artyom Shraibman
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.
Alexandra Prokopenko