- +10
Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …
{
"authors": [
"Moisés Naím"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Western Europe",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
Forget Greece, it's China
If economic growth in China—the world’s economic engine—were derailed by a financial, political, social, or international accident, the effect would be much more severe than anything that happens in Greece.
Source: El Pais

The Financial Times' summary is a little less boring: "A sector that was until last year the darling of international investors is turning into a horror show [...] a development that would send shockwaves through financial markets worldwide."
Does this mean that China is headed for a crash? Not necessarily. But there is a strong possibility that China's economic growth is set to be derailed. The accident could be financial, environmental, social, or international. A collapse on the stock exchange that would wipe out people's savings, or some kind of infrastructure disaster that would prompt millions to take to the streets in protest, could be the spark that sets off a crisis that would eventually hit the economy. And that would then quickly spread around the world.
The social and political contract the Chinese Communist Party has with the people reads like this: we create millions of jobs and promise continued prosperity for you and you let us govern without you playing any part in the process. If job creation stutters so does the regime's legitimacy, and its ability to govern centrally as it has until now. There are other factors at play as well that could have dangerous political consequences: inflation, inequality, and corruption. Over the last decade, inflation has rarely risen above two percent a year. It is now at 6.2 percent, while food prices, the most politically explosive factor, have risen even higher.
Inequality before the boom was limited, and invisible to most people. It is now among the worst in the world. Urban workers earn three times more than peasants in rural areas, and the number of Chinese people among the wealthiest in the world breaks new records every year, while China's millionaires are, on average, around 15 years younger than those in other countries. Corruption has long been a problem, but it is now increasingly widespread, and far more visible, and affects almost all areas of life. The government has tried to stem the flow of graft. But highly publicized jail terms and even the death sentence for public officials are simply not working.
Economic crises tend to turn corruption from an irritation that can largely be put up with, even over long periods of time, into a powerful popular cause that rallies the population. We should remember that corruption was a determining factor in the downfall of the previous regimes in Tunisia and Egypt. The same applies as regards mounting environmental problems, which for many Chinese are not merely abstract issues. After a while, people get tired of turning on the tap to take a bath or make a cup of tea only to find that brown, foul-smelling water comes out. According to Sun Liping, a sociologist at Tsinghua University, there were 180,000 street protests against a multitude of issues in 2010. The Chinese are increasingly prepared to take to the streets to demand their rights. If this kind of activity starts to impact the economy, then what happens in China will affect us all, and much more than what is going on in Greece.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.
- The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 DaysResearch
- View From Latin AmericaCommentary
Moisés Naím
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie China
- Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?Commentary
China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.
Michael Pettis
- Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. SanctionsCommentary
Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.
Xue Gong
- Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?Commentary
China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.
Damien Ma
- Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of StabilityCommentary
But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.
Damien Ma
- China Sells Stability Amid American VolatilityCommentary
U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.
Chong Ja Ian