• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Uri Dadush"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Western Europe",
    "France",
    "Germany",
    "Europe",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "EU"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Seek Outside Help

Though Europe can help itself economically by lowering interest rates and accelerating structural reforms, financial contributions from non-European countries through the IMF are needed most.

Link Copied
By Uri Dadush
Published on Jan 30, 2012

Source: Athens News

We are not going to see growth in the eurozone this year and we may very well see a decline of economic activity in Europe as a whole in 2012. That is the baseline. In terms of what Europe could do to stimulate growth, there are three types of policies. One is the lowering of interest rates: the ECB is already doing a lot to inject liquidity into the banks and I think that this policy can be continued and expanded.

Secondly, the countries that have reasonably good fiscal shape (Germany, Finland, Austria, the Netherlands etc) can do more to extend government spending or slow down tax increases. These countries can do more on the fiscal side to help other countries in Europe. It is not going to have a huge impact, but I think it can help.

The third thing is to accelerate structural reforms and liberalisation. I know this has a bad name in Greece, because of the pain that comes with these reforms. But this is a part of what the whole of Europe, including Greece, should do in order to become a more flexible economy. In order for the EMU to function, it is essential that the labour market should be able to adjust, that firms should be competitive. This third dimension is important in the long term; however, it is not going to do a lot for Europe or for Greece in 2012 or in 2013. These things take time to work. You have to do them, but they will pay off in the long term.

What is the bottom line? A little bit more can be done, but it is not going to change the picture in a fundamental way. In the best of circumstances, if you did all three of the things that I just said, you will get a little bit more growth in 2012, not much more. The instruments are just not there, given the severity of the problems that Europe is confronting across the board.

Finally, the rest of the world can also help Europe. An extension of the IMF resources and an extension of the European Stability Mechanism and the European Financial Stability Facility requires a greater contribution not only from Germany and France and some of the healthy economies in the eurozone, but also from the rest of the world. It is the single most important thing that can be done, because if you could add another trillion euros to these combined facilities, then there is a strong likelihood that this will be reflected in increased market confidence, and interest rates in many of the most vulnerable countries can come down.

This article was orignially published in the Athens News.

About the Author

Uri Dadush

Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program

Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    The Labors of Tsipras

      Uri Dadush

  • In The Media
    Greece, Complacency, and the Euro

      Uri Dadush

Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Uri Dadush
EconomyForeign PolicyEUWestern EuropeFranceGermanyEuropeNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    How China’s Growth Model Determines Its Climate Performance

    Rather than climate ambitions, compatibility with investment and exports is why China supports both green and high-emission technologies.

      Mathias Larsen

  • Overproduction in China
    Commentary
    What’s New about Involution?

    “Involution” is a new word for an old problem, and without a very different set of policies to rein it in, it is a problem that is likely to persist.

      Michael Pettis

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.