• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Indian Cyber Front

Over the past few years, India has been paying increasing attention to the threats of crime, terrorism, and espionage in cyberspace.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Feb 2, 2015

Over the past few years, India has been paying increasing attention to the threats of crime, terrorism, and espionage in cyberspace.

At the end of November 2014, India’s Communications and IT Minister, Ravi Shankar Prasad, cited official statistics that showed tens of thousands of cyber security breaches in recent years, including incidents of phishing, scanning, spam, malicious code, and website intrusions.

There is no question that India faces a significant cyberspace threat and that the number of cyber-attacks on Indian government structures is on the rise. The telecommunication and banking industries are also under threat. Ordinary Internet and mobile phone users frequently fall victim to these attacks. According to Kaspersky Lab, 7.9 percent of attacks on mobile devices in the world occurred in India, which made the country second only to Russia by number of such attacks.

In alphabetical order, Algeria, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, the European Union, Pakistan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the United States topped the list of the states whose territories were used to launch cyber-attacks against India. Hacker groups with ties to governments and/or radical and terrorist organizations and organized crime figure prominently among the attackers.

India officially recognizes the poor state of its offensive and defensive cyber technologies. Apart from breaches of security protocol and inadequate monitoring and defense, India’s vulnerability in cyberspace stems from the import and use of foreign software and telecommunication equipment.

For instance, in 2009, the National Technical Research Organization purchased encryption devices for the Indian Air Force from the India-based Bharat Electronics Ltd, but it was subsequently discovered that the devices were made in China.

India is reacting to the spike in cybercrime. A total of 1,791, 2,876 and 4,356 cybercrime cases were registered under the Information Technology Act in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Some of these were classified under the cybercrime-related sections of the Indian Penal Code: a total of 422 (23.6 percent of all cases), 601 (20.9 percent) and 1,337 cases (30.7 percent) in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. However, only 1 percent of those charged were convicted, which points to flaws in Indian law, as well as to the country’s limited law enforcement capabilities in the sphere of cybercrime.

The growing cyber threat should force India to take more active steps toward developing both offensive and defensive technologies in cyberspace. The state also needs to increase coordination between its agencies and develop a roadmap for guaranteeing cyberspace security. In the absence of a single strategy, about a dozen Indian agencies often find themselves out of sync with one another, which lowers the effectiveness of the steps they take, especially in light of the limited resources (7.8 million dollars in 2013) committed to their fight against cyber threats.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

  • In The Media
    Premonition of Nuclear Threat

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
SecurityTechnologySouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of Everything

    Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.


      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Xi walking into a room with people standing and applauding around him
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Xi Doctrine Zeros in on “High-Quality Development” for China’s Economic Future

    In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    ASEAN-China Digital Cooperation: Deeper but Clear-Eyed Engagement

    ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    China’s Mediation Offer in the Thailand-Cambodia Border Dispute Sheds Light on Beijing’s Security Role in Southeast Asia

    The Thai-Cambodian conflict highlights the limits to China's peacemaker ambition and the significance of this role on Southeast Asia’s balance of power.

      Pongphisoot (Paul) Busbarat

  • Trump and Xi on a red background
    Commentary
    Emissary
    China Is Determined to Hold Firm Against Trump’s Pressure

    Beijing believes that Washington is overestimating its own leverage and its ability to handle the trade war’s impacts. 

      • Sheena Chestnut Greitens

      Rick Waters, Sheena Chestnut Greitens

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.