• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "Asia",
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

The Great Game Folio: Manohar Parrikar and Ashton B. Carter

Manohar Parrikar and Ashton B. Carter are under pressure to cope with the challenges of the current fluid power dynamic in Asia.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Jun 2, 2015

Source: Indian Express

US Defence Secretary Ashton B. Carter, on his first visit to New Delhi after taking charge, will hold talks with Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar this week. On the face of it, Parrikar and Carter have little in common. The former Goa chief minister is a newcomer to the national stage; Carter’s formidable reputation as a leading defence intellectual precedes him. Carter has served as assistant secretary, undersecretary and deputy secretary in the Pentagon since the early 1990s, before becoming the top gun of the US defence department last year. He has taught at Oxford University and the Harvard Kennedy School.

But Carter and Parrikar do share an interest in science and technology. Carter has a PhD in theoretical physics from Oxford. Parrikar has graduated from IIT-Mumbai in metallurgical engineering, run a private business producing hydraulic equipment and is interested in fluid
power engineering.

This shared background might come in handy as the two leaders seek to inject fresh life into the Indo-US Defence Technology and Trade Initiative (DTTI). Although it was launched with much fanfare under UPA 2, there has been little progress. Carter, who led the negotiations on the US side when the DTTI was launched in 2012, is acutely conscious of the problems on both sides. If he is eager to impart greater strategic purpose to America’s bilateral defence relationship with India, Carter will find Parrikar rather different from his predecessor at South Block — A.K. Antony.

Sea Change

Within a year, the Narendra Modi government has brought significant changes to India’s defence policy. It has ended the paralysis on arms acquisition and put greater emphasis on creating a defence industrial base. It has encouraged the participation of private and foreign capital in Indian defence production. These initiatives have created a much better policy environment for the DTTI.

Equally important, Parrikar has demonstrated the political will to shake things up in the MoD, which had become acutely sclerotic under Antony’s extended reign. Parrikar decisively cut through the bureaucratic logjam on the purchase of Rafale fighters. He has also taken the surgeon’s knife to the DRDO. After sacking the DRDO chief earlier, Parrikar has separated the posts of DRDO chief and scientific advisor to the defence minister. For the first time since Indira Gandhi brought a young scientist, V.S. Arunachalam, to head the DRDO in the early 1980s, Parrikar has injected younger blood into leadership positions.

Vietnam to Vizag

That Carter is stopping at the Visakhapatnam naval station on his way from Vietnam to Delhi tells us how radically the Asian context for an India-US partnership has changed. Vietnam, which inflicted a humiliating military defeat on the US exactly four decades ago, is now actively seeking stronger defence ties with Washington.

Well until the mid-1980s, Delhi had to constantly deal with Washington’s misperception that India had given base facilities to the Soviet Union in Vizag. Today, Carter sees Vizag as the lynchpin of India’s “Act East” strategy. Vietnam and India have not given up their security cooperation with Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Even as they buy weapons from Moscow, Delhi and Hanoi see Washington as critical to the new balance of power, a part of their “Russia Plus” strategy amid the rapid rise of Chinese military power. Last January, PM Narendra Modi and US President Barack Obama unveiled a new vision for security cooperation in Asia and the Pacific.

It is now up to Parrikar and Carter to translate that vision into a practical roadmap on a range of areas — from collaboration on aircraft carrier design to coordination of humanitarian assistance and disaster relief, and from joint production of weapons systems to coordination with friends and partners in the Indo-Pacific.

Carter’s well-known commitment to deepening defence cooperation with India and Parrikar’s determination to recast India’s defence structures do set the stage for a rebooting of the India-US strategic partnership. Both are under pressure to cope with the challenges of the current fluid power dynamic in Asia.

This article was originally published by the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicyTechnologyUnited StatesAsiaSouth AsiaIndiaNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    Malaysia’s Year as ASEAN Chair: Managing Disorder

    Malaysia’s chairmanship sought to fend off short-term challenges while laying the groundwork for minimizing ASEAN’s longer-term exposure to external stresses.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    When It Comes to Superpower Geopolitics, Malaysia Is Staunchly Nonpartisan

    For Malaysia, the conjunction that works is “and” not “or” when it comes to the United States and China.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    ASEAN-China Digital Cooperation: Deeper but Clear-Eyed Engagement

    ASEAN needs to determine how to balance perpetuating the benefits of technology cooperation with China while mitigating the risks of getting caught in the crosshairs of U.S.-China gamesmanship.

      Elina Noor

  • Commentary
    Neither Comrade nor Ally: Decoding Vietnam’s First Army Drill with China

    In July 2025, Vietnam and China held their first joint army drill, a modest but symbolic move reflecting Hanoi’s strategic hedging amid U.S.–China rivalry.

      • Nguyen-khac-giang

      Nguyễn Khắc Giang

  • Commentary
    Today’s Rare Earths Conflict Echoes the 1973 Oil Crisis — But It’s Not the Same

    Regulation, not embargo, allows Beijing to shape how other countries and firms adapt to its terms.

      Alvin Camba

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.