• Commentary
  • Research
  • Experts
  • Events
Carnegie China logoCarnegie lettermark logo
{
  "authors": [
    "Alexander Gabuev"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Putin-Xi Friendship Driving Russia-China Ties

In the last two years the warm friendship between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping is perhaps the only reason why large deals are still being made.

Link Copied
By Alexander Gabuev
Published on Jun 3, 2016

Source: Kommersant

At the end of June Vladimir Putin will visit China. The visit coincides with the second anniversary of Russia's “swing towards the East,” which was symbolized by the Shanghai talks and the “deal of the century” for the Power of Siberia pipeline.

However, over the last two years there is still no answer to the question of whether Russia has been able to build a new model of relations with China.

A recent Kommersant article first described the sides' grandiose intentions and then explained why they are destined to remain only on paper.

This was the case with the idea of giving the Chinese access to large oil and gas deposits (they did not agree on the prices), substitute Western money with Chinese money (which was more expensive and more difficult to obtain) and build a highway from China to Europe as a part of the Silk Road project (there has not been any news on it for a year). Another example will be mentioned below.

Disillusionment has already seeped into the public space when it comes to Russia-China trade ties. During the Russia-China conference organized by the Russian International Affairs Council, policy experts along with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov spoke about an unending friendship.

But in the business sessions Viktor Vekselberg called the level of cooperation in innovation “catastrophic,” while China's former ambassador to Russia Li Fenglin complained that “Gazprom is trying to play hide and seek with China” and “is rather difficult.”

Behind the scenes the participants complained that the excessive desire to be friends only created new problems. For example, the companies are forced to run around and present their projects to three intergovernmental commissions, whose authorities are not always defined.

The bottom line, according to the Chinese, is that in the last two years the most effective cooperation mechanism has been the personal relationship between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. The warm friendship is perhaps the only reason why large deals are still being made.

It is this friendship that is responsible for the success of Yamal LNG attracting a new Chinese shareholder. This camaraderie paved the way for a $12 billion loan for the project from Chinese state banks (with very advantageous interest rates for Russia).

The relations between the leaders also explain the successful sale of a stake in Sibur to Sinopec, and the agreement to provide credit for Moscow-Kazan high-speed railway without state guarantees.

“The Chinese president sees that China cannot help all of Russia's economy, but is willing to help precisely those projects that are important for President Putin,” Chinese experts say.

In such conditions, expectations for large deals to be made during Putin's June visit are modest. Chinese banks have enormous resources, but they are not limitless, and they can finance only those projects that belong to the leaders' closest business friends and companies.  While investing in Russia, Chinese companies seek profitability, which is hard to come by in times of crises.

The translation of this article was published in the Russia Beyond the Headlines.

About the Author

Alexander Gabuev
Alexander Gabuev

Director, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Alexander Gabuev is director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. Gabuev’s research is focused on Russian foreign policy with particular focus on the impact of the war in Ukraine and the Sino-Russia relationship. Since joining Carnegie in 2015, Gabuev has contributed commentary and analysis to a wide range of publications, including the Financial Times, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Economist.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Iran War Fallout Gifts Putin Diplomatic Victory at ASEAN Summit
      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev

  • Commentary
    Did Putin Return From China Empty-Handed?
      • Alexander Gabuev

      Alexander Gabuev

Alexander Gabuev
Director, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Alexander Gabuev
Foreign PolicyEast AsiaChinaRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie China

  • Commentary
    China Financial Markets
    Who Paid for China’s Last Debt Cleanup, and Who Will Pay for the Next?

    China’s banking crisis in the 2000s was resolved by transferring the costs to households through financial repression—a decision that recapitalized the banks while exacerbating the structural imbalances that continue to shape the Chinese economy today.

      Michael Pettis

  • Robot arm with disposable test tube virus sampling in laboratory
    Commentary
    Caught in the Middle: Chinese Biotech Firms’ Divergent Responses to U.S. Sanctions

    Chinese biotech companies have been on the receiving end of U.S. economic coercion. Yet their responses have differed significantly because firm and state interests are not uniformly aligned. For Washington, treating all Chinese tech firms the same, irrespective of their actual interests, risks pushing them farther into Beijing’s corner.

      Xue Gong

  • An aerial drone photo taken on June 4, 2026 shows a wind-photovoltaic power storage station of Huadian Inner Mongolia New Energy Co., Ltd. as part of the Horinger data center cluster green energy supply demonstration project, in Hohhot, north China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
    Commentary
    Are Data Centers the Solution to China’s Renewables Excess Capacity?

    China’s latest energy plan explicitly calls for integrating data centers into the electricity system, particularly connecting them to green energy. It appears Beijing wants to use compute as a source of domestic demand to absorb renewables excess capacity.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability

    But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • Commentary
    China Sells Stability Amid American Volatility

    U.S. unpredictability has allowed China to capitalize on its positioning as the “responsible great power”. Paradoxically, the more China wins the perception game, the more likely expectations will rise for Beijing to deliver not just words but to demonstrate with its deeds.

      Chong Ja Ian

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
Carnegie China logo, white
Keck Seng Tower133 Cecil Street #10-01ASingapore, 069535Phone: +65 9650 7648
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie China
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.