• Research
  • Politika
  • About
Carnegie Russia Eurasia center logoCarnegie lettermark logo
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North Africa",
    "Egypt"
  ],
  "topics": []
}
Other

National Association for Change

A backgrounder on the National Association for Change.

Link Copied
Published on Sep 22, 2010

This resource was published on 09/22/2010 and is not updated to reflect changing circumstances.

The National Association for Change was formed by former International Atomic Energy Association head Mohammed ElBaradei and a close group of supporters in February 2010, at a time when opposition activity was at a low point, and became the most visible movement  challenging the regime until the January 2011 uprising.

In the more diverse and complex post-uprising political scene, with revived opposition parties and a variety of active protest movements, the National Association for Change has lost the visibility and prominence it enjoyed when it was first created. It remains active, however, and may play a prominent role if Mohamed ElBaradei becomes a presidential candidate, as expected.

Major Figures

Mohammed ElBaradei: Movement leader
Hassan Nafaa: General Coordinator
Hamdi Qandil: Spokesman

Background

The National Association for Change (NAC) is a broad opposition coalition pushing for pro-democracy constitutional reforms.. The association is the product of an initial meeting in February 2010 at ElBaradei’s home of approximately 30 politicians, intellectuals, activists, and other prominent figures in Egypt who identified with the renewed call for democratic reforms that the return of ElBaradei prompted.  Almost all opposition groups and movements were represented at the meeting (and the subsequent establishment of the NAC), except the Wafd, Nasserite, and al-Tagammu’ parties.

The NAC was designed to be a broad movement rather than a political party.  According to the head of the campaign calling for an ElBaradei presidency, Abdelrahman Yousef, “The association is not a political organization with a clear structure and its head is not ElBaradei and he never was. The coalition is a general popular movement and its members are the signatories of the petition. He is a symbol for change and for the association.”

The  NAC received much attention during 2010 with its a nationwide campaign to collect at least one million signatures for a seven-point program of reforms aiming at ensuring free and fair elections. The demands included: ending the state of emergency; ensuring judicial oversight over the election process; allowing local and international civil society groups to monitor elections; allowing equal access to media for all candidates, particularly during presidential elections; giving Egyptians living abroad the right to vote at Egyptian embassies and consulates; ensuring the right to run for president without arbitrary restrictions in accordance with Egypt’s obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as limit the president’s service to two terms; voting by using the national identification card rather than a special voters’ registration card. Some of these reforms were incorporated in the constitutional amendments introduced by the SCAF in March 2011.

During the January uprising, the NAC and ElBaradei were active in the street protests but were never at the forefront. The NAC has been opposed to many aspects of the government of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF). Its main demands at present are lifting the emergency law and ending military trials for civilians.

North AfricaEgypt

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Second Russia-Africa Summit Lays Bare Russia’s Waning Influence

    Trade volumes between Russia and African nations have fallen since the last event in 2019, while the war in Ukraine and Wagner’s activities on the continent have strained political ties.

      Vadim Zaytsev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What’s Behind Russia’s Charm Offensive in Africa?

    Africa is becoming a battlefield of artificial narratives. The Kremlin pretends it is creating a “second front” and challenging the rules-based order, while the West feigns concern over the Kremlin’s actions there, while knowing perfectly well that the main threat to its interests in the region is actually China.

      Vadim Zaytsev

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Russia’s Mediation Goals in Libya

    In order to secure its economic interests in Libya, Russia is seeking to bolster Haftar’s influence over a future UN-brokered diplomatic settlement.

      Samuel Ramani

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Why Sisi Seems Worried

    Egypt’s upcoming presidential election may not remove the incumbent, but many problems lie ahead if he wins.

      Michele Dunne

  • Article
    Do Terrorist Trends in Africa Justify the U.S. Military’s Expansion?

    Based on the data, policymakers and practitioners need to ask hard questions about whether the terrorist threat justifies a continuing U.S. military buildup in Africa.

      Steve Feldstein

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Carnegie Russia Eurasia logo, white
  • Research
  • Politika
  • About
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Privacy
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.