For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.
Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia",
"Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"China",
"North America"
],
"topics": []
}REQUIRED IMAGE
The Carnegie Corporation of New York invested $3 million in the Carnegie China Program in Washington and Beijing.
WASHINGTON and NEW YORK, Jan 9—Carnegie Corporation of New York, a grantmaking foundation, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, building the first global think tank, today jointly announced a $3 million investment by the Corporation in the Carnegie China Program in Washington and Beijing.
"We are immensely grateful to the Carnegie Corporation of New York for its generous support of and investment in the Endowment’s China Program in Washington and Beijing, and particularly to its president, Vartan Gregorian, for his leadership. Coming on the eve of the first anniversary of the launch of our NEW VISION, this financial support is a tremendous further endorsement of a key component of the mission we are pursuing,” said Jessica T. Mathews, president of the Carnegie Endowment.
"If we are to move toward a more stable and prosperous world, it is imperative that the United States redefine the nature of its relationships with major and emerging powers,” said Vartan Gregorian, president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. “We are particularly in need of innovative research to inform our near– and long-term policies toward China.”
Gregorian added that the deep pool of subject matter expertise cultivated by the Endowment in China and throughout the world will benefit the partners as they seek to better understand the impact of globalization on foreign, economic, and security policy making.
The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace was the first think tank headquartered in the United States to establish a joint presence in Beijing and Washington. Two core features distinguish the Endowment’s work in China:
Most recently, the Endowment began a multi-year project to move past the gridlock that has prevented meaningful action by the United States and China on climate change. In October 2007, the Program partnered with China’s Energy Research Institute on a Beijing workshop on “Energy Security and Climate: How Can the U.S. and China Cooperate and Lead?”
The Endowment has also held a series of conferences in Beijing that draw on its staff in Washington, Beirut, and Moscow, as well as Beijing. Together with CRF, it co-hosted meetings on “Rising India: Opportunities and Lessons for China,” “New Security Challenges in Northeast Asia,” “China’s Environmental Protection System,” and “Energy Cooperation between China, Russia, and Central Asia,” which included senior Russian researchers from the Carnegie Moscow Center and a team from Washington. A September 2007 conference explored the impacts of President Bush’s policies on world order.
Andrew Carnegie gave generously in support of peace, including his creation in 1910 of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace “to hasten the abolition of international war” and his endowment in 1911 of Carnegie Corporation of New York to promote “the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding.”
###

About Carnegie Corporation of New York:
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.
Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter
EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
2026 has started in crisis, as the actions of unpredictable leaders shape an increasingly volatile global environment. To shift from crisis response to strategic foresight, what under-the-radar issues should the EU prepare for in the coming year?
Thomas de Waal
China plays an increasingly active role in the Kremlin’s hybrid war against Europe. The EU must confront this growing China-Russia cooperation, as it poses grave threats to both European security and economic resilience.
Maksym Beznosiuk
COP30 takes place amidst increased pessimism about the world’s commitment to energy transition and ecological protection. Beset by a host of other challenges, can Europe still maintain its role as a driver of global climate action?
Thomas de Waal