• Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Europe logoCarnegie lettermark logo
EUUkraine
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "Japan",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Japan’s Earthquake: Not an Economic Catastrophe

The Japanese earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear incident of 2011 will be remembered as a terrible human tragedy—but not one with lasting economic or financial consequences.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Mar 20, 2011

Source: El Pais

Japan’s Earthquake: Not an Economic CatastropheIt is as impossible not to be moved by the images of suffering and destruction in Japan as it is not to be surprised by the stoicism of the victims. Usually, the scenes following a disaster are of panic, disorder, and even looting. In Japan, we see long lines of people calmly awaiting medical attention or buying food. And faces that reflect an unimaginable pain that is seldom expressed stridently. The Japanese deserve our admiration and solidarity.

The international financial markets are also behaving at odds with what one would expect after such a disaster. They are betting that the Japanese economy recuperates sooner than the images of devastation may suggest. They also bet that the financial impact in other countries will be minor and the long-term economic effects will not be significant.

Less than one week after disaster hit Japan—with the nuclear plants still burning and the stock market in decline—international investment funds specializing in Japanese companies received record amounts of money. That week, investors deposited $956 million; the week before, the amount was a meager $180 million.

The same happened with the currency. Days after the tragedy, the yen reached its highest level since World War II. A currency this strong has very harmful effects on the country’s exports and causes multiple international imbalances. The central banks of the seven most industrialized countries intervened and were able to stabilize the yen at more reasonable levels. This, too, was unusual: central bank coordination of this kind had not happened in over a decade.

The yen had strengthened because the markets anticipated a massive repatriation of Japanese capital deposited in other countries and currencies. As this money will be needed to finance the nation’s reconstruction, demand for the yen will obviously increase. Assuming that this would raise the value of the currency, speculators rushed to buy yen. But in this case some lost their bet: the central banks’ intervention contained the yen’s appreciation.

Those who will probably not lose, however, are the investors betting on Japan’s rapid recovery. While this accident was devastating, the highest estimate of its costs is $300 million, with a majority of analysts estimating the damage at $200 million. If proven correct, this estimate represents only 4 percent of Japanese economic activity and 1 percent of the country’s wealth. Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf points out that in Japan, the world financial crisis had an impact equivalent to 10 percent of its economy, and Japan had the hardest-hit economy among the world’s richest nations. Even though the images we saw in Japan after the financial crisis were not as painful and dramatic as those we see now, the reality is that the 2009 crash affected a vastly larger number of Japanese.

Another calculation is that Japan’s recovery will be as quick as those of other major catastrophes. HSBC’s Garry Evans studied the financial impacts of the earthquakes in Kobe, Japan in 1995, Taiwan in 1999, Chile in 2010, and the September 11 terrorist attacks. He found that after an initial fall, the respective stock markets recovered to their pre-catastrophe level between 23 and 78 days afterward. One hundred days later, they were above this level. Moreover, the economies affected by these disasters grew, thanks to the stimulus sparked by the reconstruction efforts and investments. In 2010, Chile suffered from a devastating earthquake and grew 5 percent. After the Kobe earthquake, Japan’s growth rate also accelerated.

Obviously, Japan’s tragedy has other negative economic effects, many of which may not even be apparent yet. For now it is clear, for example, that global supply chains have been disrupted by the damage to Japan’s manufacturing base. This, in turn, may fuel global inflationary pressures. The insurance sector will also be hard hit, as will the nuclear energy industry. That this will be the case is another conclusion international markets seem to have reached: as the price of most other commodities has soared, that of uranium dropped 30 percent.

The Japanese earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear incident of 2011 will be remembered as a terrible human tragedy—but not one with lasting economic consequences.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyNuclear EnergyEast AsiaJapanNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Europe

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe and the Arab Gulf Must Come Together

    The war in Iran proves the United States is now a destabilizing actor for Europe and the Arab Gulf. From protect their economies and energy supplies to safeguarding their territorial integrity, both regions have much to gain from forming a new kind of partnership together.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Trump United Nations multilateralism institutions 2236462680
    Article
    Resetting Cyber Relations with the United States

    For years, the United States anchored global cyber diplomacy. As Washington rethinks its leadership role, the launch of the UN’s Cyber Global Mechanism may test how allies adjust their engagement.

      • Christopher Painter

      Patryk Pawlak, Chris Painter

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    How Europe Can Survive the AI Labor Transition

    Integrating AI into the workplace will increase job insecurity, fundamentally reshaping labor markets. To anticipate and manage this transition, the EU must build public trust, provide training infrastructures, and establish social protections.

      Amanda Coakley

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Attract Foreign Investment and Reduce Dependencies?

    EU member states clash over how to boost the union’s competitiveness: Some want to favor European industries in public procurement, while others worry this could deter foreign investment. So, can the EU simultaneously attract global capital and reduce dependencies?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Europe Falls Behind in the South Caucasus Connectivity Race

    The EU lacks leadership and strategic planning in the South Caucasus, while the United States is leading the charge. To secure its geopolitical interests, Brussels must invest in new connectivity for the region.

      Zaur Shiriyev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
Carnegie Europe logo, white
Rue du Congrès, 151000 Brussels, Belgium
  • Research
  • Strategic Europe
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Gender Equality Plan
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Europe
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.