Article
This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.
Vrinda Sahai
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"U.S. Nuclear Policy"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Caucasus",
"Russia"
],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}
REQUIRED IMAGE
Press Release
A practical path to deep nuclear reductions
President Obama has identified the goal of creating the conditions that would allow for deep reductions in nuclear arsenals. In a report released at the 2011 Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference, James M. Acton lays out a detailed policy agenda to reduce U.S. and Russian stockpiles.
Published on Mar 28, 2011
WASHINGTON—President Obama has identified the goal of creating the conditions that would allow for deep reductions in nuclear arsenals. In a report released today at the 2011 Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference, James M. Acton lays out a detailed policy agenda to reduce U.S. and Russian stockpiles by a factor of ten—to 500 nuclear warheads each—and those of other nuclear-armed states to no more than half that number. To do so, Washington must follow a practical and multi-pronged approach.
Policy recommendations:
- Take a comprehensive approach on arms control. U.S. arms control policy must be geared towards three key goals: verifiable elimination of warheads, deterrence of rearmament, and reduction of the incentives to strike first in a crisis.
- Engage with U.S. allies to review security threats and responses. Washington must convince its allies in Europe and East Asia to support deep reductions by identifying security threats and appropriate non-nuclear responses, and by demonstrating that reducing the size of its arsenal does not represent a reduced commitment to their continued security.
- Address conventional imbalances. In the short term, the United States should pursue conventional arms control efforts in Europe to reduce the chance that Russia will link them into the next round of nuclear negotiations. In the long term, deep reductions will only be possible if Washington and Beijing can accept rough equality of capability in the West Pacific.
- Push for a transparent and multilateral process. Enhanced transparency from France, the United Kingdom, and especially China will advance a multilateral arms control process. But, before that is possible, Washington and Beijing must engage in a program of mutual strategic reassurance.
"While cutting the number of nuclear weapons so significantly is a formidable challenge, the United States, Russia, and other nations can do much in the short term to advance this goal," Acton writes. "Washington should lead this process to ensure that it at least gets started."
NOTES
Click here to read the full report.
James M. Acton is an associate in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment. A physicist by training, Acton specializes in nonproliferation, deterrence, and disarmament.
The Carnegie Nuclear Policy Program is an internationally acclaimed source of expertise and policy thinking on nuclear industry, nonproliferation, security, and disarmament. Its multinational staff stays at the forefront of nuclear policy issues in the United States, Russia, China, Northeast Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East.
Press Contact: Karly Schledwitz, +1 202 939 2233, pressoffice@ceip.org
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026
- The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor CooperationCommentary
The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.
Shruti Mittal
- What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?Article
India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.
Konark Bhandari
- India Signs the Pax Silica—A Counter to Pax Sinica?Commentary
On the last day of the India AI Impact Summit, India signed Pax Silica, a U.S.-led declaration seemingly focused on semiconductors. While India’s accession to the same was not entirely unforeseen, becoming a signatory nation this quickly was not on the cards either.
Konark Bhandari
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai
