• Research
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie India logoCarnegie lettermark logo
AI
{
  "authors": [
    "Dmitri Trenin"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "East Asia",
    "South Korea",
    "China",
    "Japan",
    "Southeast Asia",
    "Russia",
    "North Korea"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Climate Change",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

The Asian Connection

Connectivity in Asia and the Pacific, one of the main themes of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, held on October 7 and 8 in Bali, is certainly growing.

Link Copied
By Dmitri Trenin
Published on Oct 7, 2013

For a second year in a row, President Obama has skipped the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, held on October 7 and 8 in Bali, Indonesia. Last year, this was due to the U.S. presidential campaign, then at its final stage. This year, the reason is the U.S. Government shutdown. There is talk of the U.S. "pivot to Asia" petering out. The Obama Administration is certainly distracted by the political paralysis at home and the developments in the Middle East. However, there is no question that Asia-Pacific has moved to the top of Washington's long-term priorities. The Middle East is taking the time and requiring an effort, but Asia will define the future.

In Obama's absence, President Putin, who has arrived in Bali, will also devote more time to Asia on his trip: the issue of Syria has been delegated to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Secretary of State John Kerry. Moscow is also in the process of "pivoting to Asia" which, in the Russian context, means above all giving more priority to its own provinces east of the Urals: Siberia and the Far East. Last year's APEC summit in Vladivostok was used as a vehicle for upgrading the city's and the region's infrastructure. Last month, the Russian Far East again required Moscow's attention, due to large-scale flooding which left dozens of thousands of people homeless. At one point, Putin sent half of his cabinet to deal with the emergency. 

In foreign policy terms, Asia-Pacific is also rising on the Kremlin's horizon. The Syrian crisis has led to an even closer policy coordination between Moscow and Beijing. Putin and Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe have recently resolved to work toward full normalization of Russo-Japanese relations. Moscow is promoting economic cooperation with South Korea, and also seeks to involve North Korea in trilateral projects which should turn the North Korea into a transit country for gas exports and rail transportation and thus materially enhance stability on the Korean Peninsula. Russia is courting ASEAN, one of whose members, Vietnam, has been designated as Moscow's "strategic partner" on a par with China and India. Interestingly and tellingly, Russia talks in positive terms about relations with the United States across the Pacific.

APEC, of course, is not the only venue for top-level dialogue in Asia-Pacific. Security issues are being dealt with at the East Asia summits, which have recently opened to include the United States and Russia. The issue of free trade is central to the U.S.-proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership, which does not include China, and the East Asian proposals which do not include the United States. Russia itself has focused on continental Eurasian integration with Belarus, Kazakhstan, and other former Soviet states. Along with China, it informally leads the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which held its summit three weeks ago in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Russia pushes for the expansion of the SCO, to include India and Pakistan. Connectivity in Asia and the Pacific, one of the main themes of the Bali summit, is certainly growing.

About the Author

Dmitri Trenin

Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center

Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space

      Dmitri Trenin

  • Commentary
    What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West Revealed

      Dmitri Trenin

Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
EconomyClimate ChangeForeign PolicyNorth AmericaUnited StatesEast AsiaSouth KoreaChinaJapanSoutheast AsiaRussiaNorth Korea

Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie India

  • Commentary
    AI in Outer Space: Opportunities, Risks, and the Governance Gap

    How is AI reshaping space security, creating governance challenges, and where does international diplomacy stand today?

      Tejas Bharadwaj, Almudena Azcárate Ortega

  • Paper
    Threading the Needle: India’s Path Forward with China

    After the chill in ties between 2020 and 2024 that brought India–China relations to their lowest point in several decades, the two countries have engaged each other afresh. This paper argues that there are predominantly four imperatives guiding India’s approach to China, and they exist in an order of priority.

      Saheb Singh Chadha

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Article
    India–Africa Strategic Partnership: Challenges, Potential, and Possible Pathways

    A partnership between India, a country of subcontinental size, and Africa, a continent of fifty-four countries, may seem asymmetric until one notes that both are home to nearly the same number of people—1.4 billion. This essay spells out the existing challenges to the partnership, its optimal potential, and the possible pathways to realize it over the next quarter-century.

      Rajiv Bhatia

  • Commentary
    The Unresolved Challenges in U.S.–India Semiconductor Cooperation

    The U.S.–India semiconductor cooperation story is well-stocked with top-level strategic intent. What remains unresolved, however, are some underlying challenges that will determine whether the cooperation actually functions. Three such friction points stand out.

      Shruti Mittal

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
Carnegie India logo, white
Unit C-4, 5, 6, EdenparkShaheed Jeet Singh MargNew Delhi – 110016, IndiaPhone: 011-40078687
  • Research
  • About
  • Experts
  • Projects
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie India
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.