Article
Ariel (Eli) Levite, Toby Dalton
{
"authors": [
"Ariel (Eli) Levite"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Iranian Proliferation"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Nuclear Policy",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
The Iran Nuclear Issue
The latest deadline for the long-standing negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program is almost here. While a short extension seems likely, the talks may finally be winding down.
Published on Jun 26, 2015
Source: China Radio International’s English Service
The latest deadline for the long-standing negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program is almost here. While a short extension seems likely, the talks may finally be winding down. Iran and the major world powers have struggled over the issue since 2003. So how has this turned into a world issue? What do the different sides disagree about? And what are the stakes?
On CRI’s Today, Carnegie’s Ariel Levite argued that the negotiations have taken so long partially because the international community has tried to regain confidence in Iran. However, Iran has not collaborated on the nuclear issue, which has extended the process to well over a decade. Levite also contends that Iran has questioned the status quo in the Middle East, calling for the destruction of Israel and engaging in other activities “of deep concern.”“Between the nuclear activities and Iran’s regional behavior, it triggered a kind of crisis that has taken more than a decade to resolve, and I don’t think we’re around the corner from resolving it,” said Levite.
On the issue of sanctions, Levite argued that they were imposed “reluctantly, incrementally, and late” because Iran refused to come forward on the nuclear negotiations. “When sanctions were tightened up considerably, this was done after Iran had been given more than a decade of an opportunity to actually come clean on its past efforts in terms of nuclear weapons development,” added Levite.
“The fact that Iran is currently negotiating is a testimony to the success of sanctions ... the sanctions have brought Iran to the table, alongside mismanagement of the Iranian economy by the Ahmadinejad regime, and alongside lower oil prices. You can’t separate the three elements,” said Levite.
This interview was originally broadcast on the China Radio International’s English Service.
About the Author
Ariel (Eli) Levite
Senior Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program, Technology and International Affairs Program
Levite was the principal deputy director general for policy at the Israeli Atomic Energy Commission from 2002 to 2007.
- Promoting Responsible Nuclear Energy Conduct: An Agenda for International Cooperation
- Unpacking Trump’s National Security StrategyOther
- +18
James M. Acton, Saskia Brechenmacher, Cecily Brewer, …
Recent Work
Carnegie India does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie India
- India’s Oil Security Strategy: Structural Vulnerabilities and Strategic ChoicesArticle
This piece argues that the present Indian strategy, based on opportunistic diversification and utilization of limited strategic reserves, remains inadequate when confronting supply disruptions. It evaluates India’s options in the short, medium, and long terms.
Vrinda Sahai
- The Impact of U.S. Sanctions and Tariffs on India’s Russian Oil ImportsCommentary
This piece examines India’s response to U.S. sanctions and tariffs, specifically assessing the immediate market consequences, such as alterations in import costs, and the broader strategic implications for India’s energy security and foreign policy orientation.
Vrinda Sahai
- Military Lessons from Operation SindoorArticle
The India-Pakistan conflict that played out between May 6 and May 10, 2025, offers several military lessons. This article presents key takeaways from Operation Sindoor and breaks down how India’s preparations shaped the outcome and what more is needed to strengthen future readiness.
Dinakar Peri
- India and the Sovereignty Principle: The Disaggregation ImperativeBook
This book offers a comprehensive analysis of India's evolving relationship with sovereignty in a complex global order. Moving beyond conventional narratives, it examines how the sovereignty principle shapes India's behavior across four critical domains—from traditional military power to contemporary data governance.
Rudra Chaudhuri, Nabarun Roy
- NISAR Soars While India-U.S. Tariff Tensions SimmerCommentary
On July 30, 2025, the United States announced 25 percent tariffs on Indian goods. While diplomatic tensions simmered on the trade front, a cosmic calm prevailed at the Sriharikota launch range. Officials from NASA and ISRO were preparing to launch an engineering marvel into space—the NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), marking a significant milestone in the India-U.S. bilateral partnership.
Tejas Bharadwaj
